Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: billbears
"Of course you ignore Federalist 45 and what it states because you actually believe the national government has an interest in a purely capitalistic venture."
___________________________________________________________________

The federal government has an explicit constitutional interest in interstate commerce, which is what the stock market engages in. When you live in San Francisco and buy shares through an exchange in New York that provide you with part "ownership" of an enterprise in Missouri, you've just invited the feds into your business.

    Sec 8. Clause 3: To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes
This Constitutional provision doesn't care what you are selling and buying across state lines. It only cares that you are selling and buying something.
________________________________________________________________" Why wasn't it involved before the mid 1930s?"
__________________________________________________________________
    It was. Teddy Roosevelt forced the regulation of trusts. When Morgan, Rockefeller, Harriman and Hill bucked him, he brought suit against their Northern Securities Company, effectively dismantling it. He prevailed and the USSC upheld him on appeal. I guess they never should have crossed state lines.

238 posted on 03/08/2004 9:20:15 PM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]


To: Bonaparte
I should have read further. LOL

Thanks for correcting the erroneous garbage,before I got here. :-)

244 posted on 03/08/2004 9:41:11 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson