[Windcatcher]

Hear, hear.

The single fact that Communism advocates *abolishing private property* is reason enough to call them enemies of liberty. If you're not allowed to benefit from your labor but instead are forced to work only for the benefit of others, I call that *slavery*. Now, is it really necessary to play the antonym game with "slavery", or do we have to go into the other tenets of Communism (like that the totalitarian State would just "fade away" once Communism is established -- yeah, right).

[Syncro]

:>)