Personally, I am against amending the constitution in such a way. Don't get me wrong. I am totally against gay marriage. But the fact of the matters are 1) I believe the constitution and amendments if anything should be to limit the powers of the government and I do not want to set a precedent of amending it to limit the people, even if for something I don't believe in 2) I think it will take too great of an expenditure of political capital that.
That being said, the packing of the bench with radical liberal politicized judges that are willing to rule as the party, special interest groups, and foreign nations want them to have left little to no choice in the matter. It is the only tool left to circumvent an activist judiciary waging culture warfare on us. It makes me sick that they have pushed us to this bring.
Never forget, it is not George Bush that is waging the culture war. It is a mayor in a medium California's city and 4 appointed judges in MA who are trying to modify US domestic policy and thousands of years of human tradition.
miserable failure miserable failure miserable failure miserable failure war criminal