To: Cowgirl
One is a 70-million-year old quick-moving meat-eater found on the bottom of an Antarctic sea, while and the other is a 200-million-year-old giant plant-eater that was found on the top of a mountain, reports Reuters.70 - 200 million years old??...It's so laughable that "scientist" put their religion over fact and their own scientific method and really BELIEVE that the earth is that old when all the known evidence points to about 6-7 thousand years.
To: sirchtruth
70 - 200 million years old??...It's so laughable that "scientist" put their religion over fact and their own scientific method and really BELIEVE that the earth is that old when all the known evidence points to about 6-7 thousand years. Proof please ... serious question by the way
30 posted on
03/07/2004 10:06:39 AM PST by
Centurion2000
(Resolve to perform what you must; perform without fail that what you resolve.)
To: sirchtruth
"It's so laughable that "scientist" put their religion over fact and their own scientific method and really BELIEVE that the earth is that old when all the known evidence points to about 6-7 thousand years."What have you been smokin'?
Available recorded history goes back more than 2x's that far.
What are your sources?
36 posted on
03/07/2004 10:20:59 AM PST by
Khurkris
(Ranger On...)
To: sirchtruth
70 - 200 million years old??...It's so laughable that "scientist" put their religion over fact and their own scientific method and really BELIEVE that the earth is that old when all the known evidence points to about 6-7 thousand years. Ha ha ha ha ha. This is joke, right?
39 posted on
03/07/2004 10:28:00 AM PST by
Alter Kaker
(Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
To: sirchtruth
Just who's laughable?
70 posted on
03/07/2004 3:38:12 PM PST by
stanz
(Those who don't believe in evolution should go jump off the flat edge of the Earth.)
To: sirchtruth
all the known evidence points to about 6-7 thousand years Bzzztt.... sorry, thanks for playing.
92 posted on
03/08/2004 6:28:10 AM PST by
Modernman
("The strong do what they can, the weak suffer what they must." - Thucydides)
To: sirchtruth
Re-read Genesis carefully.
"In the begining..." then comes "and God moved over the face of the waters". There is a break in time between the two parts, of UNKNOWN (and unknowable from text) duration. The only "6-7,000 years" comes from human calculation of time from THE Adam's being "formed" (adam = mankind, having already been Created in the Sixth Day) as the Gardener. i.e. The beginnings of agricultural civilzation.
The actual "beginning" IOW, takes place at the start of the "First Earth Age" "the world that then was", etc mentioned in 2 Peter & elsewhere. That leaves more than enough room for whatever science finds & verifies about the earth's age; and also even allows what evidence of life they find from those times, which Age ended with Satan's fall.
Science & the Bible do not conflict, but it takes more than Webster's to know what some of the words used by the translators mean.
177 posted on
03/24/2004 7:32:09 PM PST by
ApplegateRanch
(The world needs more horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson