To: Alter Kaker
"Not enough fossil trees for that."Really?! Shouldn't there be? 100's of millions of years of evolution and there aren't enough fossils of even something as plentiful as trees?
125 posted on
03/08/2004 1:03:57 PM PST by
DannyTN
To: DannyTN; Alter Kaker
"Not enough fossil trees for that." Really?! Shouldn't there be? 100's of millions of years of evolution and there aren't enough fossils of even something as plentiful as trees? Hmmm What about this forest? Patagonia
Let me guess, seeds planted by Satan to test the faithful...
131 posted on
03/08/2004 1:41:38 PM PST by
Outlaw76
(Citizens on the Bounce!)
To: DannyTN
Really?! Shouldn't there be? 100's of millions of years of evolution and there aren't enough fossils of even something as plentiful as trees?There would have to be enough fossil trees close together so as to be not have a single gap of one tree-lifetime. This of course is impossible. There are many fossil trees but not that many. Do not be absurd.
150 posted on
03/08/2004 9:12:39 PM PST by
Alter Kaker
(Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson