Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SedVictaCatoni
You will note I said WIDELY understood.
62 posted on 03/07/2004 10:45:11 AM PST by Ahban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Ahban
I think it quite possible that there was a large, local flood in the Mideast, perhaps the Black Sea event. I think that to people living there it would have seemed "world-wide." After all, I don't think those who wrote Genesis knew about Europe, let alone the Americas and Australia.

In a time where people rarely traveled more than 20 miles from their village, world-wide has a different connotation.

As far as the size of the ark, it is quite possible that the critics are wrong. It is also possible that the animals involved were LOCAL animals, leaving out elephants and penguins.

The primary purpose of the story is obedience to God and the cleansing of the area to remove iniquity. The BBC is simply doing their best to denigrate the Bible, as apparently that is part of their charter.

63 posted on 03/07/2004 11:01:40 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson