Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Actually, the day before he was taken off the air, he said he could no longer support Bush. It was the a combo of the Senate hearings into Janets boob.....and then the marriage protection amendment that turned him. He has been very anti-Bush lately. He went on the same rants against Clinton when the FCC fined him.
39 posted on 03/06/2004 1:17:31 PM PST by Feiny (Drawing on my fine command of language, I said nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: feinswinesuksass
Actually, the day before he was taken off the air, he said he could no longer support Bush. It was the a combo of the Senate hearings into Janets boob.....and then the marriage protection amendment that turned him. He has been very anti-Bush lately. He went on the same rants against Clinton when the FCC fined him

Okay. Got it. I missed that.

Still, it doesn't seem at all believable that CC canned him just for that. Personally, I think that Stern is manufacturing all this simply to get out of his contract and concentrate on his new ABC show.

96 posted on 03/06/2004 4:30:16 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: feinswinesuksass
Actually, the day before he was taken off the air, he said he could no longer support Bush. It was the a combo of the Senate hearings into Janets boob.....and then the marriage protection amendment that turned him. He has been very anti-Bush lately. He went on the same rants against Clinton when the FCC fined him.

And he still endorsed Clinton the next year, didn't he? Besides, Stern was bashing Bush before the Senate hearings even happened.

109 posted on 03/06/2004 5:37:53 PM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson