Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

After Being Yanked by Clear Channel, Howard Stern Predicts His Broadcast Demise
AP ^ | Mar. 6, 2004

Posted on 03/06/2004 11:25:54 AM PST by nuconvert

After Being Yanked by Clear Channel, Howard Stern Predicts His Broadcast Demise

Mar 6, 2004

The Associated Press

NEW YORK (AP) - Shock jock and self-proclaimed "King of All Media" Howard Stern believes his reign on the radio is coming to an end. "The show is over," he announced Friday morning on his nationally syndicated radio program. "It's over."

It's not - at least not yet. But Stern predicted that a Federal Communications Communication crackdown on indecency on the airwaves will force his salacious show off the dial.

"I'm guessing that sometime next week will be my last show on this station," said Stern, adding that he expected the FCC to hit him with a whopping indecency fine. "There's a cultural war going on. The religious right is winning. We're losing."

A telephone call to Infinity Broadcasting, which syndicates Stern's show, was not returned Saturday to discuss Stern's comments.

On Friday, Stern devoted the first 2 1/2 hours of his show to his anticipated demise, a change of pace from the usual fare of naked women and toilet humor.

Clear Channel Communications yanked Stern from stations in San Diego, Pittsburgh, Rochester, N.Y., Louisville, Ky., and Fort Lauderdale and Orlando, Fla. on Feb. 25. The company said the suspension would last until the Stern show met its programming guidelines.

"This time they have to fire me," Stern said. "I'm through. I'm a dead man walking."

On Thursday, Clear Channel paid a record $755,000 fine levied last month by the FCC for indecent material aired by several of its stations


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: clearchannel; radio; stern
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-236 next last
To: Irene Adler
I agree about this "bundling" issue.
Then let the market decide.

Another aspect is that for example, ESPN gets a couple bux plus from the cables for each subscriber, plus they sell advertising. Either free or ad supported works as a new
regulation for me. Not both.


The deals between the cables and "channels" would need to be rewritten to be "per subscriber who opts for the channel" rather than for each subscriber.

No big deal, FCC should say "make it happen". Digital systems could easily do it, today. They are "addressible" so the cables will know what folks are watching, negating thier "increased theft potential" argument. Not to mention any of thier other excuses.
_____________________________
As far as this "gov'mint shuttin down free speech" talk, Clear channel is not the gov'mint.

Clear channel folded pretty quick, I suggest they were looking for an excuse.


141 posted on 03/06/2004 7:28:02 PM PST by pending
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright; Central Scrutiniser; feinswinesuksass
"The 'public' airwaves eh? Do you also support 'public' ownership of newspapers too? I'm almost afraid to hear the answer. By the way, public is just a pretty word for government and politicians."

Do you libertarians, anything-goes type have problems with porno run on the Cartoon Network? Or graphic front page pictures of fornication ok with you?

Cut the bull-sh*t -- our government has ALWAYS enforced "decency" standards through censorship and obscenity laws. The excremement has FINALLY hit the fan and a line was drawn -- too effin bad. You can always get your kicks and "free speech" though the internet.

142 posted on 03/06/2004 7:28:07 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: feinswinesuksass
You are so right. Since yesterday morning, listening to Howard and the seriousness of the situation, I'm thinking of switching from Republican to Independent. Morally, I don't want to be associated with this Republican party, and that's after 30 years of Republican voting. They have the Presidency, the House and the Senate...and what we do we get? Campaign Finance Reform and now the attack on Free Speech for the "sake of the children." Savage is right when he calls them Democans.
143 posted on 03/06/2004 7:28:55 PM PST by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
Howard raiseing the battle cry to Sodom and Gomorrah..
"Raise up fight or get normal.."
144 posted on 03/06/2004 7:33:42 PM PST by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago; PJ-Comix
"Since when do liberals need precedents to do anything? Even if this didn't happen with Howard, the libs would still like to shut down Rush if they could get away with it."

True...

And the day the U.S. government shut down Rush on some obscure technicallly under the guise of "hate speech" is the day Civil War II has begun.

145 posted on 03/06/2004 7:37:13 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
And the day the U.S. government shut down Rush on some obscure technicallly under the guise of "hate speech" is the day Civil War II has begun.

It won't happen - as long as the shops are open and the sun is shining, people will go about their day. Even if they, at that point it'd be too late to do anything. For example, if they could shut down Rush, Free Republic would be nothing more than target practice.

146 posted on 03/06/2004 7:43:16 PM PST by garbanzo (Free people will set the course of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: garbanzo
"It won't happen - as long as the shops are open and the sun is shining, people will go about their day. Even if they, at that point it'd be too late to do anything. For example, if they could shut down Rush, Free Republic would be nothing more than target practice."

Above ground things may appear to be "business as usual," but I would imagine the anticipated mobilization would immediately begin gurgling below ground and online. It becomes clearer why the government is plotting the total regulation of the internet these days.

Free Republic would indeed become a ghost town that same day Rush is taken out -- only though to fragment into a bunch of mini-versions...We can assume some strange days are on the way.

147 posted on 03/06/2004 7:56:21 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
After reading your posts, I have decided that I would be in favor of the government censoring hyperbole.

Its for the children...

148 posted on 03/06/2004 9:30:54 PM PST by Central Scrutiniser (Don't hate me because I'm beautiful...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
True... And the day the U.S. government shut down Rush on some obscure technicallly under the guise of "hate speech" is the day Civil War II has begun.

You got that right!

149 posted on 03/06/2004 11:41:45 PM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
And "we" would be who?

The people who think that there's a constitutional right to talk dirty every day without ever getting their show cancelled. Never mind that Stern cackled over gay activists getting Dr. Laura's TV show shut down, and I don't remember him being upset about her right to free speech.

I gotta say that Stern's martyr act is wearing really thin. And some freepers still claim he's really a conservative at heart!

150 posted on 03/06/2004 11:50:29 PM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago
"And some freepers still claim he's really a conservative at heart!"

You must be referring to the freepers who also claim they're the only TRUE conservatives at FR.

151 posted on 03/06/2004 11:52:01 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner
You are so right. Since yesterday morning, listening to Howard and the seriousness of the situation, I'm thinking of switching from Republican to Independent.

Did you agree with Howard when he said that "Bush hasn't done anything to make America safer," when Stern's claimed for the past 2 1/2 years that Bush has done just that?

152 posted on 03/06/2004 11:56:27 PM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago
What difference does that make, whether I agree with Howard or not?
153 posted on 03/07/2004 12:41:17 AM PST by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner
What difference does that make, whether I agree with Howard or not?

Because you yourself said that Howard's comments had convinced you to change from being a Republican to an independent. I'm just pointing out that Howard Stern is not exactly the political sage of all time (or even a consistent one), and he is perfectly willing to backtrack on 2 1/2 years of supporting the president on the WOT because of Stern's own petulance. Listening to Howard's advice on politics is about as worthwhile as voting for somebody because the Dixie Chicks tell you to.

154 posted on 03/07/2004 1:49:36 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

Comment #155 Removed by Moderator

To: The Westerner; NYCVirago
"Listening to Howard and the seriousness of the situation, I'm thinking of switching from Republican to Independent. Morally, I don't want to be associated with this Republican party...what we do we get? Campaign Finance Reform and now the attack on Free Speech for the 'sake of the children.'"

Lol -- what phony outrage --who are you BS'ing?? As though you were EVER a Republican in the first place??...

But btw, "morally," what do you get with the Democratic Party?

Speaking of the "sake of the children" -- is it the "right" to murder unborn babies? The "right" to marry your same-sex "partner," German Shepherd, or hand-puppet? The "freedom" to screw like a couple of dogs in public park? That's a Democrat's idea of "enlightenment."

You people are amusing. Go find yourtself a life in Amsterdam -- they're far less uptight about "morals" there.

156 posted on 03/07/2004 7:21:45 AM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Salo
- but I don't like our already-too-big-and-powerful government shutting down radio shows, either.

Wasn't it only clear channel that decided not to air his show? That's a lot different from the government telling him he can't go on.

157 posted on 03/07/2004 7:36:34 AM PST by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
I have a problem with parents who are too lazy to put parent controls on their T.V. sets and then try to deprive adults of liberty because of their laziness.

Amsterdam. No thanks. The control freaks should go there since, after all, it is a city where the government protects and subsidizes people from cradle and grave. I, on the other hand, believe in the American dream of freedom and responsibility. The two stand and fall together.

158 posted on 03/07/2004 8:24:45 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Shethink13
Welfare recipients don't believe they should have "to pay" for anything either. TASTAFL.
159 posted on 03/07/2004 8:26:12 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
The government-owened airwaves shouldn't provide a "forum" for anyone. They should be privatized. I realize that adoption of private property is strange concept to the people who love the idea of "public" contol, however.
160 posted on 03/07/2004 8:29:13 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-236 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson