To: Gothmog
Brune claims that efforts to discredit Wilson began before Novak's column -- but -- he cites no evidence any of those efforts by the WH included information that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA. Exactly. The Bush administration be fools not to point out that Wilson is not credible and was misrepresenting his trip, who knew what, what they "did" with what they "knew" (which in reality was nothing) and so on. Brune tries to equate that with the Plame name leak. Deceitful "reporting" to say the least.
8 posted on
03/06/2004 8:56:48 AM PST by
cyncooper
("Maybe they were hoping he'd lose the next Iraqi election")
To: cyncooper
"The Bush administration be fools"
LOL
Should read: "The Bush administration WOULD be fools"
10 posted on
03/06/2004 9:08:38 AM PST by
cyncooper
("Maybe they were hoping he'd lose the next Iraqi election")
To: cyncooper
"Exactly. The Bush administration be fools not to point out that Wilson is not credible and was misrepresenting his trip, who knew what, what they "did" with what they "knew" (which in reality was nothing) and so on. Brune tries to equate that with the Plame name leak. Deceitful "reporting" to say the least."
Who sent him to Africa is left totally out of this story.
Looks like they plan to leave nothing to chance that this was a plot to out. Surely old Joe and his wife have been questioned about what they know.
Somebody sure wants this story to stay alive, even though there is really nothing to report. That being the case is it in "CODE"?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson