Skip to comments.
I'm Sorry, Dave, You're Speeding
Wired News ^
| 02:00 AM Mar. 04, 2004 PT
| Patrick Gray
Posted on 03/05/2004 5:15:39 PM PST by JOAT
Edited on 06/29/2004 7:10:23 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
MELBOURNE, Australia -- At the Melbourne Motor Show last week, Toyota unveiled a controversial concept car that would very closely monitor, and in some cases restrict, the actions of its driver -- including refusing to turn on.
To drive the sleek Toyota Sportivo, a driver would have to enter a memory card into its console to turn on the engine. Based on the driver's experience and driving record, the car adjusts its engine performance, cutting back for motorists with less experience or spotty driving records.
(Excerpt) Read more at wired.com ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: conceptcar; control; invention; nannystate; toyota; willnotsell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
"Drivers of the future who have grown up in an electronic age of heavy remote speed camera enforcement measures and electronic tollway charging systems are accepting of new technology that assists their lifestyle as well as monitoring it," a Toyota press release about the car says. "It is essential for drivers to be fully and accurately informed in this era of increasing electronic surveillance." Gee, quit fighting, this is inevitable. Just accept your chains with a bland smile.
1
posted on
03/05/2004 5:15:40 PM PST
by
JOAT
To: JOAT
How long before stolen or counterfeit cards would be become a huge business?
2
posted on
03/05/2004 5:18:00 PM PST
by
stylin_geek
(Koffi: 0, G.W. Bush: (I lost count))
To: stylin_geek
Would like an answer in minutes or seconds?
3
posted on
03/05/2004 5:19:59 PM PST
by
jigsaw
(God Bless Our Troops.)
To: JOAT
I want Larry Ellison to have this car.
4
posted on
03/05/2004 5:20:30 PM PST
by
537 Votes
(The more things change, the more change accelerates.)
To: JOAT
Our cars already have enough robotics to drive themselves. And they should drive themselves, freeing us from our self-perpetuated prole chains.
5
posted on
03/05/2004 5:21:32 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
To: JOAT
"It is essential for drivers to be fully and accurately informed in this era of increasing electronic surveillance." Oh yeah? Well surveil THIS ya ijit!
6
posted on
03/05/2004 5:21:44 PM PST
by
Enterprise
("Do you know who I am?")
To: JOAT
BOHICA.
Toyota and Australia can go f*ck themselves!
7
posted on
03/05/2004 5:22:05 PM PST
by
sauropod
(I intend to have Red Kerry choke on his past.)
To: stylin_geek
How long before stolen or counterfeit cards would be become a huge business?That's why we'll get them under the skin in short order. Can't have your "papers" missing, after all, they'll want you to show your ID for everything in the future:
And Australia's federal government has considered a universal ID, called the Australia Card. The proposed card would store a wide array of personal information, and Australians would have to carry it at all times to obtain employment, health care and government services.
Coming to our shores soon!
8
posted on
03/05/2004 5:22:48 PM PST
by
JOAT
To: countrydummy
Although I do see the benefits in one particular case to a car that can drive itself.
9
posted on
03/05/2004 5:23:33 PM PST
by
sauropod
(I intend to have Red Kerry choke on his past.)
To: RightWhale
our self-perpetuated prole chains.I like this one: Phone and GPS devices let the driver keep track of friends' whereabouts.
Cause they'll be chipped at all times too don't cha know...Won't that be special? Everyone can be located by their "friends" at ANY time!
10
posted on
03/05/2004 5:26:30 PM PST
by
JOAT
To: JOAT
disgusting
11
posted on
03/05/2004 5:34:44 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Resolve to perform what you must; perform without fail that what you resolve.)
To: JOAT
I predict they will millions. </sarcasm>
12
posted on
03/05/2004 5:34:58 PM PST
by
Kirkwood
To: JOAT
Well, there is something to be said for a vehicle like this in SOME ->I SAID S-O-M-E<- situations!
For instance, commuters in areas such as Los Angeles, just MIGHT be passengers in cars whizzing by at 90 MPH, instead of the average what? 2 or 3 mph? during rush hour!
It was rather obvious to me while I was there that the number of cars passing a given spot in the parking lots they call Interstates near LA is NO GREATER than would be the case if ALL the cars were doing 90 mph on the way home!
Granted, away from rush hour traffic it wouldn't be much fun to drive, but I bet there are those in and near big cities that would enjoy getting home in 15 minutes instead of 3 hours as it is now.
And maybe have another car for when you are visiting other parts of the country.
Face it, the abilities of all drivers is not the same. An army of EXCEPTIONAL drivers could do over 70 MPH all the way home in many large cities.
Maybe the "auto controls" could take over only on SOME trafficways?
Then, when you reached your own neighborhood, the car would drive normally.
I really think something like this will happen someday, probably not for a hundred years though.
13
posted on
03/05/2004 5:54:25 PM PST
by
RonHolzwarth
(rush hour is long, boring, and no fun)
To: stylin_geek
Exactly. Zillions of kids would just fork over $100 to some website for the "Al Unser Jr" profile card.
Unlimited top end, etc., etc.
To: JOAT

Michael: "KITT I need you!"
KITT: "Its about time!"
15
posted on
03/05/2004 7:18:35 PM PST
by
lainie
To: jigsaw
A rhetorical answer to a rhetorical question. Behold, symmetry has been achieved!
16
posted on
03/05/2004 9:13:03 PM PST
by
stylin_geek
(Koffi: 0, G.W. Bush: (I lost count))
To: lainie
Speaking of Hasselhoff.....
Press Here Not for the faint of heart!
(Push Play)
17
posted on
03/05/2004 9:44:35 PM PST
by
JOAT
To: JOAT
Gee, quit fighting, this is inevitable. Just accept your chains with a bland smile.
LOL! Thanks for the chuckle!
To: JOAT
Welcome to FreeRepublic. I love your turn of phrase here:
Gee, quit fighting, this is inevitable. Just accept your chains with a bland smile.
19
posted on
03/05/2004 9:52:03 PM PST
by
Petronski
(John Kerry looks like . . . like . . . weakness.)
To: RonHolzwarth
Interesting post.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson