Skip to comments.
The Jesuit scholar who translated `The Passion'
Catholic Citizens ^
| March 4, 2004
| Nathan Bierma
Posted on 03/05/2004 8:57:20 AM PST by NYer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
1
posted on
03/05/2004 8:57:21 AM PST
by
NYer
To: american colleen; sinkspur; Lady In Blue; Salvation; CAtholic Family Association; narses; ...
Catholic Ping - let me know if you want on/off this list
2
posted on
03/05/2004 8:59:27 AM PST
by
NYer
(Ad Jesum per Mariam)
To: NYer
bump
3
posted on
03/05/2004 9:05:30 AM PST
by
VOA
To: NYer
Crazy.
4
posted on
03/05/2004 9:10:28 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: NYer
on the list
5
posted on
03/05/2004 9:12:39 AM PST
by
Nov3
To: NYer
The Latin seems to be a mistake.
The local Roman administrators and soldiers probably would have been Greek speakers.
To: NYer
7
posted on
03/05/2004 9:23:28 AM PST
by
Congressman Billybob
(www.ArmorforCongress.com Visit. Join. Help. Please.)
To: proxy_user
I've seen this comment about the lack of Greek in the Passion a few times, and thought I would address it.
While it is true that after AD 100 the soldiers and administrators of the eastern Empire increasingly spoke Greek as their primary language, in the Julio-Claudian era about 90% of the legionnaires were still recruited from Italy (this would drop to a tiny percentage by the 2nd century; by the time of the events in the movie Gladiator, for example, most of the troops were recruited from Gaul, Illyria, Moesia, Anatolia and Syria).
So although Pilate and other equestrians serving in the East would certainly be able to speak Greek, which was the lingua franca of the Hellenized areas of the Empire, both he and his legionnaires generally would speak in Latin, as the movie reflects.
8
posted on
03/05/2004 9:25:51 AM PST
by
ojnab_bob
To: NYer; dansangel
Wow something lighthearted for a change....
9
posted on
03/05/2004 9:28:53 AM PST
by
.45MAN
(The New Testament is concealed in the Old and the Old Testament is revealed in the New)
To: proxy_user
I must disagree with you. The Roman soldiers would have spoke Latin in some dialect. The legions of Rome, which are depicted in the movie, were exclusively recruited from among Roman citizens. At the time, the only place where Roman citizens lived, was Italy, and various Army retirement camps set up throughout the empire (like Trier in Germany) so the soldiers would have spoken Latin. Case can be made that Pilate would have spoken Greek, but he two was Roman, from Italy, Latin would have been his first language. A better method for that scene, would have been Pilate, speaking Latin, a translator into Greek, and then Jesus responding in Greek.
To: NYer
This is fascinating stuff. Are there (ancient) Aramaic dictionaries? Latin ones?
As for naughty latin dictionaries, there is at least one that I know of... if I can put my fingers on it.
11
posted on
03/05/2004 10:12:09 AM PST
by
Publius6961
(50.3% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks (subject to a final count).)
To: NWU Army ROTC
A better method for that scene, would have been Pilate, speaking Latin, a translator into Greek, and then Jesus responding in Greek. I respectfully disagree....as Jesus is God...and as such...hardly need any formal education..
He came to teach... He raised the dead...gave sight to the blind ...and healed lepers by his touch....this done in front of thousands of witnesses...
The disciples later declared...that if every miracle they saw Him perform was written down ..they would fill volumes...
Jesus is God and proved himself to be so....he needed no translators...and could have as easily spoken in Swahili or Cherakowa Apache
Although your version would have been kinda neat if..once Pilate's latin had been translated into Greek having Jesus answer back in Latin saying he had no need of a translator...
imo
12
posted on
03/05/2004 10:26:24 AM PST
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: NYer
Loyola Marymount University
Yep, and I just heard it first hand from a friend from the K of C where he told me that his nephew is a cameraman out in Hollywood and told his uncle that Mel did months of research at Loyola Marymount before writing the script.
13
posted on
03/05/2004 10:51:27 AM PST
by
Coleus
(Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
To: NWU Army ROTC
"Case can be made that Pilate would have spoken Greek, but he two was Roman, from Italy, Latin would have been his first language."
I believe Pilate was from Spain. Spain had been Roman since the end of the Punic Wars. I believe that the merchant class of spain was largely Greek speaking but who knows Pilate's actual background. He could more easily have been a native Latin speaker. Based on what I have read regarding archeology of Roman camps, the soldiers would have spoken whatever Latin they could. I can't imagine a officer of any rank not using Latin when conducting his official duties.
14
posted on
03/05/2004 1:13:14 PM PST
by
rogator
To: aristeides
You might find this article of interest.
15
posted on
03/05/2004 1:25:51 PM PST
by
ELS
To: rogator
Have you seen the film? I ask only because I am having an argument with a collegaue over the costumes and uniforms worn by the Romans in the film...he states these uniforms and the body armour are historically and culturally inaccurate. Is this true? I do not know one way or the other.
thanks
16
posted on
03/05/2004 5:09:50 PM PST
by
Mrs.Liberty
("Oh people, this is freedom! "...Liberated Iraqi man, 09 APR 2003)
To: NYer
Great info. Thanks so much.
17
posted on
03/05/2004 7:01:13 PM PST
by
Victoria Delsoul
(Those who CRITICIZE the Passion believing Jesus is NOT the Son of God are not worth considering)
To: Mrs.Liberty
Based on reliefs on various monuments as well as artistic renditions the uniforms/armor looked quite authentic. Maybe we have a professional archeologist or Roman historian on the board who will respond to this.
The uniforms etc. are certainly subject to artistic license but were definitely within the parameters of what I would expect.
18
posted on
03/06/2004 7:27:05 AM PST
by
rogator
To: NWU Army ROTC; proxy_user
Paul's first letters to the Romans were immediately translated to Latin so that the "Romans" could be proselytized.
NWU is correct. If the soldiers were in fact Roman they spoke Latin.
19
posted on
03/06/2004 7:38:56 AM PST
by
AAABEST
(<a href="http://www.angelqueen.org">Traditional Catholicism is Back and Growing</a>)
To: ELS
Thanks. I do find it surprising that Gibson used no Greek at all, when he could have used the unaltered words of the New Testament for at least some of the dialogue.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson