[Pukin Dog]

Hubble is junk, and always was junk. Those pretty pictures that you see get all their colorization and perspective from "artists" on the ground. The computers in Hubble are of the early Intel 486 variety, the stabilization gyroscopes were known to have reliability problems before Hubble was ever launched. The thing takes pictures that have to be massaged, colored, focused and aligned on the ground. For providing scientific information, it is close to worthless.
How uniformed can YOU get?

[Prodigal Son]

Hubble is junk, and always was junk...For providing scientific information, it is close to worthless.

You're kidding right?

[Nonstatist]

For providing scientific information, it is close to worthless.

You dont know what youre talking about. The science instruments that have been updated every couple years are state of the art. The science discovered has been substantial. Even the replacement gyroscope's life has been extended.

Only a vain nitwit would think three hundred scientists at the Hopkins Space Institute would be on the "take", supporting a total fraud on the science community.

Back to the pound for you, puking dog.

[CommandoFrank]

Those pretty pictures that you see get all their colorization and perspective from "artists" on the ground.

So tell me, Pukin Dog, did we really go to the moon or was that fake too. Just curious...