[The Hound Passer]

"Since you addressed this to "All," I suggest you remove the plank from your own eye, and more thoroughly read the thread."

And I'd suggest that you take strong note that my post starts out:

"I think many of you are overreacting to the commentary and vastly misinterpreting it."

When I was in school I was taught that "many," does not mean all. There are some good posts here. I was not refering to them, and I only addressed my post generally to "all," because I didn't see the need to single out anyone in particular. Obviously, I stuck a nerve with you.

[Sabertooth]

"Since you addressed this to "All," I suggest you remove the plank from your own eye, and more thoroughly read the thread."

And I'd suggest that you take strong note that my post starts out:

"I think many of you are overreacting to the commentary and vastly misinterpreting it."

When I was in school I was taught that "many," does not mean all. There are some good posts here. I was not refering to them, and I only addressed my post generally to "all," because I didn't see the need to single out anyone in particular. Obviously, I stuck a nerve with you.

You struck a nerve because "All" means "all." You wrote both "all" and "many."

You think your meaning or intentions are clear?

In a thread full of blood libels and religious smears, now including your own, you ought to do better than wade into it as indiscriminately as you did.

Yes, you do have an obligation to be specific and precise.