Replies

The homosexuals are trying to spin objection to homsexual marriage as a mere religious issue.

religion has as much to do with objections as "love".

We as conservatives need to focus on the non-religious grounds.

Lesson 1. NEVER let a homosexal proponent of homosexual marriage as you your religious believe. The correct answer is "none of your business, that is personal". It keeps them from marginalizing us.

The focus has to be on children. The media is shilling for the homosexuals because many IN the media ARE homosexuals. (the NYT is described as essentially a closed homosexual shop.)

This is the final push to make anyone who objects to homosexuality FOR WHATEVER REASON, ultimatly unable to get a job, advance publicly, or have any part of social discourse. We need to push back HARD on this. Not just write to Republican and weak willed RINO's, we need to put the pressure on the Democrats in office now. They need to know that the pro-homosexual position is not the "default" postion of society in general.

Homosexuals are attempting to PR themselves as "cultural" elites, the arbiters of good and bad. They never expected such opposition.

The problem conservatives have is that while we have the numbers, homosexuals have the organizational money. They are hollyweird people who are willing to fund money to their push to normalize the lifestyle.

We can define the debate by making all homosexual marriage about private adult sex. Marginalize the homosexuals before they marginalize us.

I think the perverts are crossing the line for most folks.

As more and more people see that homosexual,liberal and Democrat all fit together,we'll see more folks turning to the Conservative Right.

"Democrat?...I didn't know you were queer."

Maybe not a perfect quote but close to what you said before.Would make a good tag. :)

I agree with everything you say, especially about the children. They are in the schools, and they are actively recruiting prey. And if some kids escape that fate, they will be future assistants of homosexuals.

But I don't think it's necessary to ignore or leave out religion, for this reason: Every actual world religion condemns same sex acts, as well as sex outside of legitimate marriage, and has for thousands of years. Even Buddhism and Taoism, which are not actual religions although followed in a similar manner, condemn homosexual acts. I agree that citing religious tenets is not going to convince anyone, but the fact that condemnation of same sex acts is monolithic in scope is good to know and useful to bring out when needed.

IOW, opposition to same sex acts is universal except for the participants themselves and those they hold in thrall.