Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cicero; Pharmer; All; My2Cents; onyx; FairOpinion; PhiKapMom; ohioWfan
With all due respect, those who lost family members in September, October and November 2001 to the terrorist hijackings and anthrax attacks (which I never leave out) DO NOT OWN THOSE EVENTS. September 11, 2001 and the anthrax attacks were perpetrated against the United States of America.

They were epoch-altering events. This November, the American electorate will be divided along the lines of those who still have not grasped this fact and those who do.

The presidency of George W. Bush (as well as the man, himself) was forever marked and altered by those events, which were the defining moments of the GWB presidency. His response during that gut-churning time is not part of his record, but CENTRAL TO his record.

Anyone who says he should avoid mention of 9/11 in his ads, or any other time during his campaign, is actually trying to prevent GWB from running on his record. Near as I can remember, this is the first time a president's political opponents want to avoid a discussion of his bona fide record. Gee, I wonder why...

42 posted on 03/04/2004 7:56:47 PM PST by Wolfstar (Yo! "Real" conservatives. Won't back GWB? See no harm in a Kerrified nation? You're suicidal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Wolfstar
I think we should hit a bigger nerve and show THIS event in the ads..........hehe......


50 posted on 03/04/2004 8:10:50 PM PST by ohioWfan (BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar
Excellent post, Wolfstar!
54 posted on 03/04/2004 8:18:22 PM PST by BlueAngel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar
Exactly! 

It's the same for any group that wishes to create an exclusive province for any event or any symbol (the Confederate battle flag comes to mind, or the statue of Jefferson Davis in the KY capitol, etc., etc., etc.).

I worked with someone who was killed n 9/11. Not a close friend, but more than a mere acquaintance. Does that give me some special privilege for deciding on the memorial architecture or deciding who uses the images of 9/11 in free political speech? I don't think so.

If Al Quada had sent one terrorist over to NYC on 9/11 to murder one person on a street corner - and the assailant was prosecuted, it would be The State of New York vs. [fill in the blank - name of terrorist]. It is the state which prosecutes criminal acts on behalf of all of the population. An attack the magnitude of 9/11 was an attack on our nation as a whole. While the families deserve and have received our sympathy and support - they are not elevated to a special position by that victim hood to determine things like national security policy or strategic decisions about the war on terrorism. It is a matter for the entire country to evaluate and debate and decide, through our elected representatives and officials. As such, issues in the aftermath of 9/11 and symbolized  by some subdued glimpse of 9/11 in a commercial are not beyond propriety.

I'd like to know if Democratic party operatives or Kerry campaign staff were working the phones last night after the release of the ads - ginning up reaction from the firemen (already endorsers of Kerry) and the select widows and survivors who have commented so far. That is the politicization of 9/11 that we should be outraged about.

 

 

 

 

 

 

55 posted on 03/04/2004 8:21:07 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken (Seldom right, never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar
Excellent post.
71 posted on 03/04/2004 8:54:27 PM PST by Boxsford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar
I agree 100% with your take. When this nation needed a leader after 9-11 one man and one man alone stood and rose to the challenge. Tonight I heard the dumbest thing ever some widow of 9-11 said what right does Bush have using this as an issue while my husband was dying in one of the Towers Bush was reading stories to school kids. Chris Matthews then asked her who she voted for in 2000 and she couldn't remember or didn't want to show her true colors.
77 posted on 03/04/2004 9:05:19 PM PST by Gkubly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar
Anyone who says he should avoid mention of 9/11 in his ads, or any other time during his campaign, is actually trying to prevent GWB from running on his record. Near as I can remember, this is the first time a president's political opponents want to avoid a discussion of his bona fide record. Gee, I wonder why...

Hard to believe this is the same GWB who was continuously bashed during campaign 2000 for being weak on foreign policy. Now the media and his haters want him to ignore his strong suit? HA!

98 posted on 03/05/2004 4:34:49 AM PST by onyx (Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Jeffrey Dahmer, and Timothy McVeigh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar
Near as I can remember, this is the first time a president's political opponents want to avoid a discussion of his bona fide record.

Just elemental fairness -- they don't want Kerry's record discussed either! ;-)

117 posted on 03/05/2004 10:26:52 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson