To: The South Texan
THEY ARE TRYING TO TAKE 9/11 AWAY AS AN ISSUE: AMERICANS REMEMBER THE PRESIDENT'S LEADERSHIP DURING THAT TIME, AND THIS IS AN ATTEMPT TO TAKE 9/11 OUT OF THE PICTURE.THEY WILL FAIL!
19 posted on
03/04/2004 9:22:56 AM PST by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: Recovering_Democrat
Ditto.
They are doing everything they can to put us in Bizarro World where 9/11 never happened.
Trying to change the subject from National Security to ANYTHING ELSE.
If 9/11 "victims' families" had received ZERO DOLLARS from my taxes and my donations, I wonder how mouthy they'd be right now. Oh, that's right - they wouldn't - THEY'D BE TOO BUSY WORKING TWO JOBS TO SUPPORT THEIR NOW SINGLE-HEAD HOUSEHOLD.
20 posted on
03/04/2004 9:25:42 AM PST by
mabelkitty
(If Kerry is so "electable", then why are Democrats afraid of Nader?)
To: Recovering_Democrat
Bingo. First it was can't talk landing on the Lincoln. Then it was can't talk about Kerry's record. Now it's can't talk about 9/11. When the Bush ads talk about lower unemployment rate, higher production, etc., they'll say he can't talk about the economy.
They are attempting to muzzle the White House on all issues, while challenging him to debate the issues and telling the electorate that Bush will be avoiding the issues!
To: Recovering_Democrat
Correct. Just like early on they tried to take the aircraft carrier landing out of the picture and I sure hope they didn't succeed. I am just wondering why Bush's team would want this type of publicity so early on, they must have known full well that there would be this backlash. Anyone have an opinion?
78 posted on
03/04/2004 1:19:27 PM PST by
Toespi
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson