You're right. The good thing about a unanimous consent vote is that one dissenter, one nay vote, and it is blocked. FWIW I'll call Leahy and Jeffords on Monday.
As for Rush, I love him but he never touchs anything that smacks of "NWO", not usually. He does occasionally say something about giving up sovereignty to the UN so I suppose it's worth a shot. Hannity is the same I think. Who can guess what O'Reilly will think? If he decided it was an issue for him he would be a bulldog.
They are all worth a shot. I will compose an intro with links to send them in the morning. The more who do that the more likely they will see it and consider it.
To the Honorable Senator from Colorado, Ben Nighthorse Campbell,(I think there may be a glitch in his email program; I submitted this letter 4 times!)Congratulations on earning the "Hero of the Taxpayer" award from ATR! I am writing in reference to a new assault on the American taxpayers brought forth by Sen. Luger.
As Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee Sen. Dick Lugar (R-IN) has revived TREATY DOC 103-39, and has asked Majority Leader Bill Frist for a "unanimous consent" vote on this Law of the Sea Treaty.
As I read it, LOST gives the United Nations new power to subvert our Constitution, institute new taxes, and control sea travel, exploration and harvesting of resources within 12 miles of our shores.
Therefore in the best interests of America - to deny the U.N. the power to tax American citizens - please be the loudly dissenting voice for the American People in the Senate on this new form of taxation and backdoor thievery of American Sovereignty.
With many thanks for your service to America