To: Piefloater
The headline seems to indicate "nukes" as in nuclear weapons but the article just says "nuclear power."
A big difference in subtle wording... bad writing on the part of the author.
12 posted on
03/04/2004 5:39:09 AM PST by
Lunatic Fringe
("Fellow citizens, we cannot escape history." -Abraham Lincoln, 1862)
To: Lunatic Fringe
The headline seems to indicate "nukes" as in nuclear weapons but the article just says "nuclear power." A big difference in subtle wording... bad writing on the part of the author. Not really, while the wording is vague, the offer came from a military man to a military man. I think the implication that they are talking about weapons rather than power generation is obvious, especially since Nigeria is rather oil rich.
25 posted on
03/04/2004 10:18:24 AM PST by
blanknoone
(How much of her money will Teresa let Kerry waste on his Presidential bid?)
To: Lunatic Fringe
The headline seems to indicate "nukes" as in nuclear weapons but the article just says "nuclear power." Considering the offer was made by Pakistan's top general in the context of "strengthen its military capability", I don't think we are talking about "Atoms for Paece" here.
34 posted on
03/04/2004 4:45:30 PM PST by
Oztrich Boy
(Despise not the jester. Often he is the only one telling the truth)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson