Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Women's group criticizes Hull over comments on his divorce
Daily Herald ^ | 3/2/2004 | Eric Krol

Posted on 03/03/2004 7:23:28 PM PST by Kuksool

Illinois' leading women's rights group reversed field Monday and criticized Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Blair Hull for comments following the release of his stormy divorce records late last week.

The Chicago chapter of the National Organization for Women also called on Hull to provide a "clear, emphatic statement" on the issue of domestic violence before the March 16 primary.

But the group's late-coming criticism of Hull raised two issues of its own.

Hull already filled out an extensive questionnaire for the group's state chapter last summer that included four questions on domestic violence. And, Jennifer Koehler, Chicago NOW's president who delivered the Hull criticism, works for Cook County Board Commissioner Mike Quigley, a supporter of Hull opponent Dan Hynes.

Koehler denied any link between the Hull criticism and her boss's favored candidate.

"My day job has nothing to do with my activism," said Koehler, a seven-year board member for the group.

But a Hull spokesman put the blame on Hynes' campaign.

"Our opponents are clearly fueling this story, as Blair invited NOW to meet with him on this issue before (the papers) became public last week," Hull spokesman Jason Erkes said. "This just shows you how powerful the Democratic machine is in Chicago."

Hynes spokeswoman Chris Mather said the Hynes campaign had absolutely nothing to do with NOW's criticism.

The flap comes as Hull is trying to put behind him a tumultuous week involving his divorce records. The records, which he released Friday after newspaper reports and columns about an order of protection filed against him in 1998 by then-wife Brenda Sexton, showed Sexton told police he punched her in the shin and told a judge Hull threatened to kill her and called her profanely derogatory names.

Hull has declined to address the allegations. That, Koehler said, is why she criticized him. She said he was creating the impression that he'd rather discuss "real issues" such as health care.

"Throughout this process, we've been eager to hear from him. For the past week, there's been a deafening silence from him and his campaign," Koehler said. "What has he done to change? That's the piece that's missing out of this personal story."

Erkes pointed to Hull's record of supporting abortion rights groups financially and to his support of Title IX, which ensures equality for women in college sports.

The women's group did not criticize Hull last Friday. Instead, it told female voters to weigh the divorce case against Hull's strong pro-female record.

Criticize: Hull keeping quiet about allegations


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: blairhull; electionussenate; now

1 posted on 03/03/2004 7:23:28 PM PST by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
Oh my God! They criticized a Rat! Did the nether regions freeze over.
2 posted on 03/03/2004 7:26:04 PM PST by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
showed Sexton told police he punched her in the shin

Huh? That's a weird place to wack someone.
3 posted on 03/03/2004 7:27:43 PM PST by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Creel; fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued; LdSentinal; JohnnyZ; Impy; AuH2ORepublican
I have previously said that I was intending to vote for Obama in the upcoming IL Presidential primary. Turnout is going to be pathetically low. Now, I am considering to vote for Hull. The NOW witches are the supreme hypocrites. They will support a wife beater and rapist as long as he's a pro-abort. In fact, Hull is typical of men who favor abortion.
4 posted on 03/03/2004 7:28:07 PM PST by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
Sounds like presidential material for democrats.
5 posted on 03/03/2004 7:32:57 PM PST by Ron in Acreage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
Must be a mistake; the guy is obviously a Republican. They got it wrong.
6 posted on 03/03/2004 7:39:35 PM PST by Salvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lelio
Huh? That's a weird place to wack someone

Unless your a mafia type.... very painful, keeps the upper body free from marks but gets the point across

7 posted on 03/03/2004 8:11:59 PM PST by martinidon ("who would Saddam and Osama vote for in this years election...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson