[don-o]

Bad advice.

Some tell me how such a clymer get so prominent?

[PeteFromMontana]

Oh crap, I thought we had a pretty good chance in November and now I see Dick thinks so too.

Everybody had better get used to President Kerry

</sarcasm

[Excuse_My_Bellicosity]

The only thing that is required to ruin Kerry is to ask him how he's going to win the War on Terrorism, or is he going to choose to just hunker down, pull the shades, and wait for the next Sept. 11th?

A DemonRat wouldn't lift a finger to protect the country even if we started losing cities in nuclear fireballs and everybody had the pox. They'd sit in the ruins and blame the other party.

[Paleo Conservative]

In opting for Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts and turning down Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina, Democrats have broken from the pragmatism and moderation that dominated their party?s profile under Bill Clinton and Al Gore in the 1990s.

No! Just the appearance of moderation. Bill Clinton is the most leftwing president we've ever had. He let his unelected appointees force the most controversial aspects of the left's agenda.

[ServesURight]

Hey Dick, chew on this:

[yooper]

If the White House happens to be reading this, I would strongly urge them to do just the opposite of whatever Morris advises. The man is more inaccurate than the National Weather Service.......

[GailA]

hanoi john has flipped flopped on every issue, last year he was against the death penalty for terrorist who kill Americans. Now he's for it.

One thing he had been stead fast on is his stance on the death penalty. He says he supports a moratorium on the death penalty at the federal level. Which means there would soon be a national moratorium on the death penalty, because of all the liberal social engineering judges and Supreme Court Justices he'd appoint.

He is OPPOSED to the death penalty for someone who would murder an American child, even a 5-year-old.

As the mother of a murdered 16 year old son, Jeremy Peter Flachbart, who was murdered by a sociopath wanting to see what it felt like to kill, I am APPALLED by this man who would be our president attitude toward crime victims.

He says HE FEELS MY PAIN.

BULL HOCKEY he can't feel my pain! He hasn't had a child brutally murdered. Only people who have lost a Loved One to homicide can begin to know the pain that comes from having a beloved child murdered.

There is a hole in my heart and in my life created by the brutal murder of my beloved child.

To me he is soft on crime just as dukakis who furloughed willie horton was.

His reasoning for opposing it is also faulty his stats are not accurate. Dudley Sharp with Justice For All can supply you with accurate stats if you need them. Dudley Sharp, Resource Director, Justice For All 713-935-9300

Sincerely,

In memory of Jeremy Peter Flachbart

Gail Keasling

KING: I've done a lot of shows recently dealing with the death of little children. A person who kills a 5-year-old should live?

KERRY: Larry, my instinct is to want to strangle that person with my own hands. I understand the instincts, I really do. I prosecuted people. I know what the feeling of the families is and everybody else.

But we have 111 people who have been now released from death row -- death row, let alone the rest of the prison system -- because of DNA evidence that showed they didn't commit the crime of which they were convicted.

After spending -- I myself worked to get a person out of jail who had been there for 15 years for a murder that person did not commit.

Now, our system has made mistakes, and it's been applied in a way that I think is wrong.

Secondly, I don't believe that, in the end, you advance the, sort of, level of your justice and the system of your civility as a nation -- and many other nations in the world, most of the other nations in the world, have adopted that idea, that the state should not engage in killing.

(APPLAUSE)

Because they have very bad memories of what happens when the state engages in killing.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10722-2004Feb26_2.html

[js1138]

Bad advice. Getting rid of Kerry before the nomination will bring up Hillary.

[Jorge]

Kerry has not been tested. He was nominated by running in the shadow of Howard Dean. Throughout the fall, all eyes were on the former Vermont governor. When he crashed and burned in late January, Kerry, as the liberal heir apparent, inherited his disappointed voters.

How true. Kerry is a dud who generated NO interest in the Dem primaries until Dean imploded.

He's had it easy since then because all the candidates focused their attacks on Bush. Kerry really has not been tested.

I believe he will be a much weaker candidate than expected.. but the Bush campaign MUST define him as the extreme liberal flip-flopping opportunist he really is.

[McGavin999]

I totally disagree with him. But then, Dick Morris is ALWAYS wrong. Somehow I trust that Karl Rove has a full battle plan completely worked out.

I can't wait to see who Kerry picks, it's going to be fun imagining whoever it is going up against Cheney in the debates. :o)

[lonestar]

Kerry has not been tested. He was nominated by running in the shadow of Howard Dean. Throughout the fall, all eyes were on the former Vermont governor.

I think this is the most important thing that will hurt Kerry. He didn't go through a tough campaign. He didn't have a major opponent after Dean cut his own throat. It would have been good practice in the general campaign to have had more of a fight in the primaries.

But I'm not a talking head on Fox News so what do I know?

[mountaineer]

Bush must begin to pull American troops out of Iraq after the handover in June. He should leave a sufficient number there, in safe, secluded bases, to intervene if the bad guys try to come back in power. But the daily drip of casualties must end. President Johnson kept the troops in Vietnam and lost. President Nixon was withdrawing them, and he won.

Most of what Toesucker says, I take with a grain of salt, but I think he's right about this. It would help Dubya immeasurably for the voters to see an end in sight. I don't know if it's possible, necessarily, and I wouldn't support anything that puts our troops at greater risk, but I can't help but think it would help.

[Free Trapper]

Kerry's poor voting record in the Senate?

You mean Kerry's been AWOL from his Senate responsibilities? ;o)

If Kerry hasn't taken his responsibilities seriously as a Senator,we sure can't trust him in a more important position.

[Cold Heat]

Dicky is on both sides of this issue, I suspect.

[Cicero]

Well, I usually take anything the toe-sucker says with a grain of salt. But for once, almost everything he says here is correct. The RNC needs to hit Kerry hard, and the best place to hit him is on his liberal, peacenik voting record and his obvious unsuitability to protect our country from dangerous enemies.

[Jim_Curtis]

Bush should run mostly positive ads.

Kerry is a walking/talking negative ad for himself. Let everyone else ( us ) educate the people on what a pile of puke Kerry is.

I would go against popular wisdom and make ads that deal with Kerry's attacks because you can redirect the attack within the ad and the ad can't be called negative.

The way we educate the people on what a traitor and piece of filth that Kerry is is by using Kerry's old tactics. Protest every event where he shows his face and carry signs that define the true Kerry. There will be fights and the media won't be able to ignore us.

The only thing that we need to start right now TODAY is a call for Kerry to release his service records because it is still fresh in everyone's mind that Bush released his.

[Always Right]

Morris is usually wrong, but I thought this was very reasonable advice. I am not sur why everyone is jumping on him. Bush can beat Kerry now by pounding his left-wing voting record.

[uncbob]

Kerry gets destroyed then the democrats will pull a NJ and change candidates

[VadeRetro]

His efforts to defund the CIA and his opposition to the funding of the Iraq war are all key targets for Bush.

Don't forget to mention his abysmal record on defense spending in general. We'd have an Air Force of F-4 Phantoms and B-52s if it were up to Kerry. No Patriot missiles. No Tomahawk cruise missiles.

We'd be equipped about the same as we were in Vietnam.

[hosepipe]

[ In opting for Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts and turning down Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina, Democrats have broken from the pragmatism and moderation that dominated their party’s profile under Bill Clinton and Al Gore in the 1990s. ]

MODERATION!...
Dickie lose the hashish!...
Its makein you sound STUPID'er...