[TN4Liberty]

We're talking about a whole series of votes over almost two decades, and they without question position him as a man of a certain view. Perfectly legitimate view, I just think it's wrong.

One difference in conservatives and liberals is that conservatives grant that the other side has a legitimate right to a position, then go about debating the position. Liberals deny that the other side has any validity whatsoever, and immediately attack the individual. In his first run, Bush did not attack Gore, saying that "we have a different vision for what the nation should be." As I recall, Gore called Bush a stupid frat-boy evil corporate stooge drunk.

Liberals can never win on their ideas. I find Cheney's approach, like Bush's, far classier and more respectful. The liberals do not deserve such classy adversaries.

[OldFriend]

Mr. Cheney, sir. G-d bless you for your service to this great country!

[Rocky]

Gee, I didn't know that Kerry had served in Viet Nam. Why haven't we heard more about that from the press?

(just kidding)

[concentric circles]

Mike Shelton - Orange County Register

[IslandTrash]

There's a remarkable contrast between the actual relative questions being asked by Hume, and every other media outlet redundant browbeating interview I've seen in the past 12 months. It's like night and day.

[SF Republican]

Vice President CHENEY is the only reason I would ever consider cloning.

[ctonious]

The playing field defined as it is, denies Bush-Cheney the ability to attack the ridiculously vulnerable positions of the jaw-droppingly hypocritical and venal Democrats, in defense of their brazenly ludicrous accusations. Their hands are tied.

Therefore, it is incumbent upon all of us, and others, to slash and maim as our opponents do. Politics is a brutal game - and I say, "Bring it on, you 'Rat scum----s!"

Or, then again, we can lose in proper and genteel fashion....