[Coeur de Lion]

This one is definitely a keeper. He's hit the "nail on the head" with respect to the pro-Gay bias in the mainstream media. It's reached a point now in this country where "gay rights" have become almost a "third rail issue." No way should anyone who dissents from the "politically correct" view on these issues provide a reasonable or cogent argument in opposition to the "heterophobes" arguments lest we either end up on the backpages or included only because our views demonstrate our inherently backwards, bigotted and "behind the times" views, which directly confirm the argument that the "heterophobes" are making.

I was watching some program the other night and it featured a Roman Catholic nun who recently published a book on the root causes of the current "pedophile" scandal in the chuch. The interviewer asked her whether homosexuality may have something to do with the scandal. Her response was not really. When the interviewer mentioned that over eighty percent of the incidents were between priests and teenage boys, her response was oh yes but these were dysfunctional homosexuals.

It's reached a point in this country where one can no longer call a spade a spade without modifying one's response in order to force adherence to the "politically correct" view.

[mrustow]

This one is definitely a keeper. He's hit the "nail on the head" with respect to the pro-Gay bias in the mainstream media. It's reached a point now in this country where "gay rights" have become almost a "third rail issue."

Ain't it the truth?! But how the heck can it be that way, when the country is opposed, 2-1 to gay marriage. A clue sahowed up the other day, when an article said that Pres. Bush didn't want to alienate "moderates" -- it's those goddamned suburban moderates again, the same ones who support illegal immigration and affirmative action!

No way should anyone who dissents from the "politically correct" view on these issues provide a reasonable or cogent argument in opposition to the "heterophobes" arguments lest we either end up on the backpages or included only because our views demonstrate our inherently backwards, bigotted and "behind the times" views, which directly confirm the argument that the "heterophobes" are making.

I was watching some program the other night and it featured a Roman Catholic nun who recently published a book on the root causes of the current "pedophile" scandal in the chuch. The interviewer asked her whether homosexuality may have something to do with the scandal. Her response was not really. When the interviewer mentioned that over eighty percent of the incidents were between priests and teenage boys, her response was oh yes but these were dysfunctional homosexuals.

"Dysfunctional homosexuals." I love it! Whether or not the sister is homosexual, she is definitely part of the radical movement that has infiltrated the RC Church over the past 30 years, and whose members bear the greatest responsibility for the pedophilia scandal.

It's reached a point in this country where one can no longer call a spade a spade without modifying one's response in order to force adherence to the "politically correct" view.

Yup. And by the time you're done "modifying" your view, you ain't got no view left you can call your own. Remember, a half truth is a whole lie.