Because it is not a subject I'm interested in addressing here. What part of that are you having a hard time understanding? The only issue that interests me here is the defamation trial, that this thread is primarily about. Please see the thread title for a hint. If you want to engage in side issues, feel free, but do it with someone who cares to address those issues.
--Boot Hill
But it's not a "side issue," BH. Two types of criminal privacy invasion were directly involved in the plaintiffs suit against ADL. Defamation was only one of the charges and it arose out of the privacy invasion.
The trial jury thought it was relevant -- to the tune of millions of dollars in award. And after all ADL's appeals were exhausted, those awards were upheld. Of course it's relevant.
So why are you so unwilling to answer a simple question?