"Not relevant to the question of defamation."I said nothing about relevance to defamation. The ADL was also accused of other things...
In their lawsuit against the ADL and its local director, the Quigleys charged not only that the ADL had defamed them, but that the Jewish group was supportive of the illegal invasion of their privacy through its use of the improperly recorded telephone conversations.
That is what my question to you refers to -- the illegal invasion of privacy.
"I said nothing about relevance to defamation."
Hence, my response to you. The issue of defamation is the only one I've raised in my posts. You want to discuss the invasion of privacy aspects of this case, while I'm only interested in discussing the defamation aspects.
--Boot Hill