Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VaGunGuy
"Wiretapping in violation of the statute IS criminal."

According to the story is was not criminal till five days after the recording began.

--Boot Hill

47 posted on 03/03/2004 3:01:30 AM PST by Boot Hill (America: Thy hand will be upon the neck of thine enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Boot Hill
The operative word there being "began"...Notice they didn't say it ENDED before the law took effect, which means it was criminal.

If I sell a drug called qwerty, and they pass a law making qwerty illegal but I continue to keep selling it, doesn't that put me in violation of the law? There's no grandfathering of surreptitious interception of verbal communication...
50 posted on 03/03/2004 3:04:33 AM PST by VaGunGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Boot Hill
Let me put it this way, BH: Do you engage in marital conversation with the expectation that you and your wife are being bugged or wiretapped?
56 posted on 03/03/2004 3:13:48 AM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson