So? Even being as bad as it is, isn't that kind of speech protected by the 1st Amendment? Even if the recordings were legal, how can one be prosecuted and convicted for verbalizing one's fantasies? How many times have we heard from law enforment officers, "Until an actual crime is committed..."
Yes it is (or should be), but it is not protected from someone else labeling such speech anti-Semitic. That is what the article was about, the results of the defamation suit brought by Quigley against the ADL for publicly calling Quigley an anti-Semite.
--Boot Hill