Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ancient_geezer
Perhaps. But it would take away congress' #1 social engineering (Ghod I hate that term) tool, punishing "bad" behavior with taxes, and rewarding "good" behavior with deductions, and "really good" behavior with credits.

Taxes would merely be a means of raising revenue, not muscling everyone around.

How would the cliton administration bought silence without the threat of punitive audits???
13 posted on 03/02/2004 10:45:00 PM PST by null and void (Pay no attention to the ones and zeros behind the curtain, and they'll return the favor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: null and void
*nevermind* Arkancide. Duh!
16 posted on 03/02/2004 10:46:10 PM PST by null and void (Pay no attention to the ones and zeros behind the curtain, and they'll return the favor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

But it would take away congress' #1 social engineering

Who is congress dependant upon above all else. Try looking at yourself as a voter.

That is why the change will be, and is in the process of occuring. Your not alone in wanting to see and end to income and payroll taxes and HR25 offers an awful lot to everyone across the income spectrum. That is why it is starting to pick more steam as more people understand just what it would mean in their own lives.

Under the Fair tax, all legal residents will receive a Family Consumption Allowence(FCA) equivalent to the FairTax paid on essential goods and services. This provides for the essense of a personal exemption under the income tax, without excepting specific goods or services allowing everything to be taxed once but only once at the retail register and not require any income qualifications to provide an exemption. Everyone receives it right up to ole Bill Gates.

The FCA will be paid in advance, in equal installments each month. The size of the monthly FCA will be determined by the government's Poverty Level for a particular family size, multiplied by the tax rate.

Every year, the Department of Health and Human Services [HHS] determine the "poverty level" for each family size.

The 2001 "FairTax" Family Consumption Allowance Figures

Family Size

HHS Poverty Level

Annual FCA

Monthly FCA

One

$8,590

$1,976

$165

Two

$17,180

$3,951

$329

Three

$20,200

$4,646

$387

Four

$23,220

$5,341

$445

Five

$26,240

$6,035

$503

Six

$29,260

$6,730

$561

Seven

$32,280

$7,424

$619

Eight

$35,300

$8,119

$677

1) Federal Register: February 16, 2001, Pages 10695-10697).

[ The monthly FCA for each adult is .23 * (HSS poverty level for a single person)/12 to assure no marriage penalty due to the manner in which the poverty level is dependant on family size. The monthly FCA for each child is .23 * (the incremental increase of HSS poverty level for a family with one child over no child) ] A. Geezer

A family of four, for example, could spend $23,220 per year free of tax because they will have received over the course of the year rebates totaling $5,341. $5,341 is the amount of sales tax paid on $23,220 in expenditures. A family spending double the "poverty level" or $46,440 per year will effectively pay tax on only half of their spending and, therefore, have an effective tax rate of 11 ½ percent or half the FairTax rate.

The beauty of the FairTax is that you can control how much you pay in taxes. If you happen to save, invest or spend a portion on used [previously taxed] items, you can get your effective tax rate below 9%.

[71] To illustrate the plan's progressive nature we can examine the tax burden that a family of four will have at various annual income levels (or in this case, annual spending levels).

H.R.2525 "The FairTax Act

Not only does every family receive a FCA based on family size, not income, but they will also receive 100% of their paycheck:

Fedup Smith makes $39K per year...once the FairTax is the law of the land he will receive an instant increase in pay of $200.00 per week. Since he has a family of four, he will receive a FCA of $445 per month, for a total of $1,305.00 additional income per month that he can do with as he sees fit

17 posted on 03/02/2004 10:56:30 PM PST by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Taxes would merely be a means of raising revenue, not muscling everyone around.

Under the Constitution that is what they should be:

Article I Section 8: "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises,
to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States;

It is up to us to see that we return to that standard. We do that by exercising our own muscle know as the vote, selecting those who will make the change over those who are not inclined to.

20 posted on 03/02/2004 11:00:49 PM PST by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
...it would take away congress' #1 social engineering...

And THAT alone makes it worth doing IMHO!!

74 posted on 03/03/2004 10:17:15 AM PST by Bigun (IRSsucks@getridof it.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson