To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I wouldn't trust Kerry if I were Bush!
2 posted on
03/02/2004 6:02:34 PM PST by
Arpege92
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Actually, according to Brit Hume .. it was KERRY who suggested to Bush that they stick to the issues.
In other words, Kerry is afraid of Bush!
5 posted on
03/02/2004 6:05:14 PM PST by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Bush Translation: "If your DNC and liberal media goons bring up some baseless B.S. about me, you're gonna pay."
7 posted on
03/02/2004 6:05:27 PM PST by
ServesURight
(FReecerely Yours,)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
According to what I heard on FOX News it was JFKerry that wanted "focus on the issues and have a clean campaign."
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I certainly hope Bush doesn't try to see into Kerry's soul.
9 posted on
03/02/2004 6:07:04 PM PST by
David1
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
What the **** did Bush call Kerry for? Kerry hasn't said one nice thing about Bush.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
It is a set up. Bush, like his dad, can play nice. RAT surrogates such as moveon will tell vicious lies about the president using Soros' money. They need to be treated like terrorists. It is a war against the DemocRATS.
13 posted on
03/02/2004 6:09:34 PM PST by
doug from upland
(Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
If true, it was a very bad move on Bush's part. He's been hammered by F-ing Kerry for months with lies and falsehoods by Kerry and his operatives. Does Bush really think that Kerry will now turn over a new leaf? We all can give the president countless net sites exposing Kerry as the lying liberal that he is. That the president would choose this tack is utterly bewildering to me.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I would say that in the modern world a soft warning from Bush carries a lot of weight.
16 posted on
03/02/2004 6:11:47 PM PST by
alex
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I hope the President plans to take the gloves off for this one.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Lets play nice?????
...now let me think....
...NAWHHHHH!
30 posted on
03/02/2004 6:18:38 PM PST by
JOE6PAK
("The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"Well, there's a first time for everything"
The sun will rise in the West and set in the ast before the democrats are "nice".
And they will never be honest because they are incapable of honesty. If they were honest they would not be democrats.
39 posted on
03/02/2004 6:29:55 PM PST by
sport
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The president can do what he wants.
But the viet era IS an issue for me.
46 posted on
03/02/2004 6:41:35 PM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of it!!)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Let that slanderous prick drone away for the next 9 months. Dubya should continue to take the high road. Let his subordinates (and us, his foot soldiers) do the dirty work. AND MAKE SURE YOU, YOUR FAMILY, AND YOUR FRIENDS ARE REGISTERED. DON'T PUT IT OFF.
The only reason his father lost was because Perot took 19% of the vote.
51 posted on
03/02/2004 6:52:47 PM PST by
Jhensy
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
If wishes were horses,
Beggers would ride.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
EARTH TO BUSH.....EARTH TO BUSH....What did being "nice" to Ted Kennedy and Tom Daschle get you?
If you are NICE to this guy...he will beat the crap out of you in the election.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
They are both vetted bonesmen from Yale, so it really doesn't matter who wins, from the viewpoint of the elite who make the rules. Both will trample on the first and second amendments. Both will spend to the advantage of the elite, thereby transferring wealth by way of deficit spending that we and are kids will pay. The bill GWB signed into law, CFR, says too much about GWB and it says all I need to know.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson