To: HankReardon
2 posted on
03/02/2004 5:14:46 PM PST by
albertabound
(It's good to beeeee Alberta bound)
To: HankReardon
Believe it or not, Canada.
3 posted on
03/02/2004 5:14:52 PM PST by
buccaneer81
(Rick Nash will score 50 goals this season...)
To: HankReardon
For the most part, they are foreign nations.
5 posted on
03/02/2004 5:18:08 PM PST by
DefCon
To: HankReardon
Canada. By far the most. I'll try and find a reference for you.
To: HankReardon
To: HankReardon
What nations does America import the most
'foreign-refined-gas/petrol' from?
/sarcasm?
10 posted on
03/02/2004 5:26:31 PM PST by
maestro
To: HankReardon
Mr. Reardon, with all due respects [and after all you did bag Dagny in Atlas Shrugged] I am not certain that you are asking a meaningful question.
Crude oil is largely fungible [refineries are typically optimized for a certain spec --- hence "largely" not completely.] Other than that the only real differences are transportation costs / availability. Embargoes such as the one in the seventies are a risk, but the net result of that one was minimal.
IMO the risk of war like acts to the tanker fleet is more important than the port from which a cargo embarks.
To: HankReardon
The question is irrelevant. Oil is a fungible commodity.
18 posted on
03/02/2004 6:15:11 PM PST by
Petronski
(John Kerry looks like . . . like . . . weakness.)
To: HankReardon
Look in The Oil and Gas Journal.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson