Skip to comments.
Clinton, Gore Set to Face 9/11 Commission
WINS News ^
| 3/2/04
Posted on 03/02/2004 7:00:47 AM PST by areafiftyone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-109 next last
To: drdeath
I do not believe that W. Bush is the "anti-Christ" nor was Ronald Reagan. I believe George W. Bush attempts to do what God would have him do each and every day, though he is as prone to mistakes as are the rest of us. He is NOT perfect. I believe that Saddam and his sons were evil, and I have no qualms with their removal.
Justice is something that happens to murderers, and governments are put in place to ensure that justice occurs. Historically, the US has been an instrument for justice for the oppressed. I believe that God has used us, US, for justice in the case of Iraq. I pray that we do not leave prematurely and make the place a bigger hell than it was. Then we would be inviting the wrath of God on our own heads.
(I'm sort of rambling here, and my random thoughts aren't exactly complete.)
To: Spotsy
Thanks! His post in #76 set an all-time low even for him. What disgusting comments. Just who died and made him king?
Now he is telling us who is a Christian and who is not. I swear he is Hillary reincarnated!
82
posted on
03/02/2004 2:20:23 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- Support Bush-Cheney '04 -- Losing is not an Option!)
To: Spotsy
You're welcome! It is so easy in hindsight to say what the President should have done! And as far as him "knowing" what was coming, I agree with PhiKapMom. He certainly wouldn't have had his wife ready to testify in the Senate about education! He wouldn't have wanted her anywhere near the Capitol, now would he? Or didn't he care if she was killed? Most of this conspiracy crap is so disgusting that it should not even be allowed here.
To: drdeath
Several weeks before 9/11, I was talking to a teacher at the school my children were attending. Her son-in-law was going to be in town that night, and she invited him to her house for dinner and to spend the night. He couldn't come. He was working for an airline, and he was REQUIRED by his employer to sleep on the plane. The plane was to be occupied by the crew (mechanical) at all times. They had been like that for a week or so. Now, why do you think that was? Perhaps, all the airlines took precautions, but they were looking at the wrong things.
To: PhiKapMom; All
He's been shown the door.
To: Admin Moderator
Thank you very much! The post in #76 was so far over the top I couldn't believe. Knew I didn't dare reply because I didn't want to see the other side of the door! :)
Don't see how you guys do it -- you have my admiration!
86
posted on
03/02/2004 2:41:14 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- Support Bush-Cheney '04 -- Losing is not an Option!)
To: Admin Moderator
Thank you. The guy was an abomination.
To: Spotsy; PhiKapMom
I was just about to post to that despicable un-FReeper because Spotsy was under attack by a lunatic. I'm shaking my head and my mouth is open in disbelief at its comments. I scroll down and see PhiKapMom said exactly what I wanted to say. And thank goodness someone used Troll B-Gone!
88
posted on
03/02/2004 2:45:08 PM PST
by
arasina
(So there.)
To: arasina
I saw his comments and went ballistic before I even saw #76. He was so far over the top I couldn't believe. Glad he got the door!
89
posted on
03/02/2004 3:00:05 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- Support Bush-Cheney '04 -- Losing is not an Option!)
To: PhiKapMom; Wait4Truth
We try to give the benefit of the doubt to newbies. Some are getting their 'sea legs' and make honest newbie mistakes, some are not sure what we're about, some are liberals questioning the liberal agenda (we need to encourage these people who want to leave the plantation), and some are so obvious. But others are clever, yes there are smart liberals, how do you think they get the sheep to follow them? Eventually, the libs show their true colors. This guy would be considered almost a 'sleeper'.
drdeath
Account # 86152
Signup 2002-08-01
Messages 1 article, 32 replies
To: Spotsy
I told the 9-11 commission about the University of Bill Clinton, home of the Al Qaeda Air Force, but they never got pack to me -- so I posted it on this website. The excerpt is long, but necessary for context. Some of the information you may find extraneous or redundant -- but believe me -- it will forever change the way you see 9-11 and those involved. Suffer through it, and I guarantee you will know the truth.
91
posted on
03/02/2004 3:04:03 PM PST
by
chickens
To: Bella; steve50
What are you two yacking about?
What do you base your moans and groans about people here at FR not wanting truth?
From what I see, people are correctly pointing out that Clinton and Gore will not be enlightening whether they are under oath or not.
By all means, swear 'em up. We want the truth. We can discern what sources and forums are not likely to yield it.
92
posted on
03/02/2004 3:12:47 PM PST
by
cyncooper
("Maybe they were hoping he'd lose the next Iraqi election")
To: PhiKapMom; Admin Moderator
His link to IndyMedia was enough evidence for me. That site is a dunghill crawling with demented minds.
93
posted on
03/02/2004 3:12:48 PM PST
by
arasina
(So there.)
To: Bella
and the attorney's not afraid to say the facts"the facts"? Like what, for instance?
94
posted on
03/02/2004 3:16:42 PM PST
by
cyncooper
("Maybe they were hoping he'd lose the next Iraqi election")
To: areafiftyone
My question would be why?
You can't believe anything a democrat says. I should say that I don't believe anything a democrat says. There are some that do. Mostly other democrats and individuals who don't have the ability to think for themselves.
Since I don't believe anything a liar [democrat]says, why waste time listening to them in the first place?
95
posted on
03/02/2004 3:46:03 PM PST
by
sport
To: Bella
I also feel that everyone should testify under oath since 3000 people had an untimely death. And what if Clinton and/or Gore are less than forthcoming under oath? Whatever they say, what do you expect to find out from our own people regarding the attack from al Qaeda? Just what do you think you're going to find out and what do you expect the fallout to be for current and former administration officials? How much responsibility do you assign to Americans as opposed to our terrorist enemies?
And the other fact, is this war that many of us here do not agree with.
Why not? If you think an American administration ought to be able to prevent attacks upon us, why wouldn't you support a war to stop our enemies?
96
posted on
03/02/2004 3:51:06 PM PST
by
cyncooper
("Maybe they were hoping he'd lose the next Iraqi election")
To: Bella
It is a waste of taxpayer money anyhow.
All they are doing is trying to blame President Bush for the World Trade Center and Pentegon attacks.
If the Republicans had any guts, they would have told the democrats and mainstream media to go fly a kite.
97
posted on
03/02/2004 3:53:18 PM PST
by
sport
To: Admin Moderator; PhiKapMom; Wait4Truth; chickens
Thank you all for your responses. I was wondering where everyone was while I was sparring with Dr Death. Never before have I seen anything so outrageous on Free Republic.
I apologize for my sarcasm in several of my posts on this thread. Anger got the best of me.
98
posted on
03/02/2004 3:58:45 PM PST
by
Spotsy
(Bush-Cheney '04)
To: Bella
You know the truth, you just don't want to face it.
99
posted on
03/02/2004 3:59:38 PM PST
by
sport
To: mewzilla
Amen!
100
posted on
03/02/2004 4:04:03 PM PST
by
sport
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-109 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson