Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim_Curtis
Our constitution is not "on fire". --- Our political process is, and the politicans responsible should be at the stake.

Yes, the political process is on fire and the way to put out the fire is with the constitutionally available process of amending. It is a better option than to use the 2nd amendment to put out the fire.

The constitution did not cause this problem. -- We've agreed that politics did.
Changing our constitution in attempting to solve our political problems can only endanger our own liberties.

You seem unable/unwilling to understand that we must change our politics.
Is it because of a vested interest?

28 posted on 03/02/2004 9:06:55 AM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines conservatism; - not the GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine
You seem unable/unwilling to understand that we must change our politics.
Is it because of a vested interest?
---
Amending the constitution would certainly "change our politics". As far as "vested interest"...I guess I do have an interest in preserving the rule of law...in that I'm a member of society.

You seem unwilling to allow for the people to protect themselves and their society legally and constitutionally in favor of having lawless judges redefine society as they see fit.
Is it because of a vested interest?

29 posted on 03/02/2004 9:55:08 AM PST by Jim_Curtis (If Benedict Arnold were alive today, Kerry would have some real competition in the dem primaries)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson