Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harvard Rips Store's'Old Voter' T-Shirt
AP ^ | 3-1-04 | LARA JAKES JORDAN

Posted on 03/01/2004 4:38:24 PM PST by Indy Pendance

WASHINGTON (AP) -- A Harvard political institute criticized the hip retailer Urban Outfitters on Monday for a new T-shirt campaign declaring that "Voting is for Old People."

The institute chided the Philadelphia-based clothing chain for appearing to wear its apathy on its chest, calling the T-shirt slogan "the wrong statement at the wrong time" in the pivotal presidential election year.

"The shirt's message could not be further from the truth," wrote Harvard Institute of Politics director Dan Glickman, the former congressman and Clinton administration agriculture secretary, and student chairman Ilan Graff in a letter to Urban Outfitters CEO Richard A. Hayne.

"We would be eager to work with you to suggest alternative products that send the right message to America's young people, and better reflect the considerable social conscience and political participation of today's youth," the letter said. "You might consider 'Voting Rocks!'"

Urban Outfitters defended the slogan as a "statement meant to draw attention to the growing rift between politicians and their platforms and the concerns of young people in this country."

"However 'open-ended' and 'ambiguous' some have felt the message to be, by offering it for sale in our stores, we clearly never intended to discourage anyone from actually voting," the company said in a statement.

Between 1972 and 2000, the so-called youth vote - among people aged 18 to 24 - declined by 13 percent in presidential elections, according a September 2002 study by the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement at the University of Maryland.

In 2000, 42 percent of the youth vote turned out at the polls, compared to 70 percent of voters over age 25, the study reported. However, asking a young person to vote raises the likelihood that they will by 8 percent to 12 percent, according to the center's data.

Urban Outfitters operates 60 stores under that name in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. It sells casual clothes, accessories, shoes, gifts and housewares.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fashion; tshirt; urbanoutfitters

1 posted on 03/01/2004 4:38:25 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
.
2 posted on 03/01/2004 4:38:42 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
The institute chided the Philadelphia-based clothing chain for appearing to wear its apathy on its chest, calling the T-shirt slogan "the wrong statement at the wrong time" in the pivotal presidential election year.

"The shirt's message could not be further from the truth," wrote Harvard Institute of Politics director Dan Glickman, the former congressman and Clinton administration agriculture secretary, and student chairman Ilan Graff in a letter to Urban Outfitters CEO Richard A. Hayne.

Wouldn't ya know it!

3 posted on 03/01/2004 4:43:20 PM PST by Paul Atreides (Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
"Voting is for Old People."

The Young People might changes their minds about voting when the Old People start retiring in droves (those that haven't already retired) and start drawing their Social Security checks and getting their government-subsidized prescription drugs.

On the other hand, it's probably just as well that many of them don't vote, if they are of the uninformed and left-wing mind-set.

4 posted on 03/01/2004 4:43:21 PM PST by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .38sw
The question is: when the young people enter the voting booths, can they read the names of the candidates?
5 posted on 03/01/2004 4:44:32 PM PST by Paul Atreides (Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
LOL! The next thing will be ballots with the candidates' photos on the touch screen, with a Donkey or an Elephant superimposed. Just touch the photo of your candidate of choice. Of course, it will be difficult to design a ballot of with pictures for the various propositions ane measures that are often on the ballot. That'll be a challenge for someone to design little pictorial representations of the propositions.
6 posted on 03/01/2004 4:47:52 PM PST by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Good old promoters of free speech, ranting against someone else's free speech. It should say "Voitng's for smart people".
7 posted on 03/01/2004 5:07:38 PM PST by RightthinkinAmerican (Try and tackle ME, Franken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson