Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar
Kabar, I completely agree with your posts. The "duh" reaction ignores the 180 degree change in NYT's former objective: to derail Bush and the invasion of Iraq on the basis of the UN Security Council's veto.

Sure, we've all known of massive corruption for a long time, but it is a HUGE shift when liberal media report it, and it was the most detailed piece I've come across. Even if the story languishes in the public eye, I believe the Western legal system, including France's, will persue indictments tenaciously.

Unfortunately, Democrats can no longer recall the UN veto because it happened about a year ago. They just know that "Bush Lied".
44 posted on 03/02/2004 9:30:40 AM PST by bukkdems
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: bukkdems
Thanks for getting the point I was trying to make, however ineptly.
47 posted on 03/02/2004 11:11:01 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson