Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Prime Choice
She was three months away from turning sixteen then it woul have been legal. I think ten years for teen sex is a bit harsh.
9 posted on 03/01/2004 1:17:07 PM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: cyborg
She was three months away from turning sixteen then it woul have been legal. I think ten years for teen sex is a bit harsh.

I'm sure the father of this girl sees it that way, too. (/sarcasm)

12 posted on 03/01/2004 1:22:01 PM PST by Prime Choice (I'm pro-choice. I just think the "choice" should be made *before* having sex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: cyborg
What's this all about??
109 posted on 03/02/2004 8:20:15 AM PST by KantianBurke (Principles, not blind loyalty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: cyborg
" I think ten years for teen sex is a bit harsh."

You are correct, however, the charge is 'child molestation', a crime that deserves every bit of ten years, if not more. The real point is that mandatory sentencing and zero tolerance are simply societal abdications of responsibility. An 18 yr old male and a 15 yr old female may be consensual, and not the same as an 18 yr old male and a 12 yr old girl, which would be child molestation. It seems now we can't deal with these cases individuality as to do so would surely be racist, or at the least, insensitive or offensive. (note sarcasm in last sentence)
145 posted on 03/02/2004 10:19:40 AM PST by bk1000 (error 404- failed to get tag line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson