To: Last Visible Dog
Because a lack of direction does not imply that there is no bias towards the end result. For example, a river isn't directed, but geologists can predict how it will look like in 100 years based on the soil content, landscape, etc... the river is undirected and yet not random.
796 posted on
03/04/2004 4:33:00 PM PST by
Nataku X
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com">Miserable Failure</a>)
To: Nakatu X
Because a lack of direction does not imply that there is no bias towards the end result. I certainly never claimed lack of direction implies there is no bias.
For example, a river isn't directed, but geologists can predict how it will look like in 100 years based on the soil content, landscape, etc... the river is undirected and yet not random
I agree.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson