Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro
Nobody is directing any selection except the critters competing to survive. If you're not *pretending* to be dumb here, you should quit now.

No. You are the one claiming nature does the selecting. You need to modify your view. Nature DOES NOT DIRECT ANYTHING - and I believe that is your current claim. (remember your first claim: random and directed are not opposites)

...and lose the insults.

In case you want to start playing games - here are your words:

At any given time, in some specific population, it[nature] is selecting stronger, or smarter....

Nature is not selecting anything - the selection is observed in the past tense.

691 posted on 03/03/2004 7:35:41 PM PST by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 685 | View Replies ]


To: Last Visible Dog
There is no conscious, purposeful selection. For all that, the outcome is not random. The trend is toward increasing adaptation to current conditions. That's it.

No anthropic Nature, no big guy with a fuzzy beard. Some are a little better at finding a way to make it. They live and pass on their genes.

If you can misunderstand that, you're trying too hard. Can the dumb-playing.

699 posted on 03/03/2004 7:50:59 PM PST by VadeRetro (Kinder and gentler than a junkyard dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson