Not at all. Only that they are not "irreducibly complex".
Aw, did you forget the last six threads already? Next time, I'll dumb it down for you.
My goal is only to point out the vacuous nature of your statements.
Really? And how did you establish any "irreducibly complex" items? Did you use the theory of evolution or a god-filled version of creationism?
Elucidate, please. Establish your (bullsh!t) premise if you can.
I'll tune back in tomorrow to see if you have posted anything worth a sh!t. (Probabilty zero - BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHA!)
And you are going to explain exactly WHY you personally think these examples are not irreducibly complex. You don't expect use to take your word on it.
Elucidate, please. Establish your (bullsh!t) premise if you can.
Well in this context my premise is you are blow-hard that hangs around evolution debates making silly comments, distrusting debate, and spewing insults (I have already provided examples). Another good example is your claim "Only that they are not irreducibly complex" which was made without one teeny tiny shard of supporting evidence.