[Angelus Errare]

That's because the problem is not the Constitution, the problem is judicial activism. This current debate has simply highlighted the problems inherent with how screwy the courts have gotten and the impotence of the general population to stop them.

All the same, I think Stanley Kurtz is correct in his assessment that allowing them to succeed in this regard would be akin to dumping blood in a shark tank as far as our would-be social engineers are concerned.

[narby]

This current debate has simply highlighted the problems inherent with how screwy the courts have gotten and the impotence of the general population to stop them.

There simply must be a solution to the dictatorial courts. We're not supposed to be a country ruled by czars and committees called "courts". We're a republic, and the citizens must activly fight to maintain our sovereinty.

The only solution is to quickly start impeaching judges. And if legislators won't do the job, then we must make that fact an issue of future elections and get someone in the State Legislatures and Congress who will take back control of the country to the elected bodies.