Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: skip2myloo
This nation survived just fine for more than 200 years, through our own Civil War, through two World Wars and a Cold War without needing the Patriot Act.

'Scuze me, but there's another war going on right now that's a good bit different from the ones you mentioned and requires some new tools to fight it. What specfic provision of the act are you at odds with?

17 posted on 03/01/2004 5:31:16 AM PST by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: tbpiper; MEG33; All
I'm still looking for SPECIFIC justification, y'all are just giving me the same ol' generalist mantra.

Instead of bolstering it's advocacy for the Patriot Act, it seems this article defeats it's own objective by proving we don't need at least Section 213, because we already have, and have had, the authority for Sneak 'n Peek searches for decades.

If you have a law that says you can/can't smell the flowers, you don't need more laws that say you can/can't smell the red flowers, and the yellow flowers and the blue flowers, etc., etc.

18 posted on 03/01/2004 6:27:25 AM PST by skip2myloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson