To: longtermmemmory
I do, too...2 in fact. However, I don't think that's the issue. Edwards is on his 'populist' soapbox, slamming the 'eeeevil corporations' and 'big business' (after all, Daddy worked in a mill).
It's the hypocrisy not the fact...though many Sub S's do get scrutiny from IRS.
11 posted on
03/01/2004 2:04:55 AM PST by
Fracas
To: Fracas
Edwards is on his 'populist' soapbox, slamming the 'eeeevil corporations' and 'big business' (after all, Daddy worked in a mill). I can't stop laughing! LOL-LOL-LOL.
His "daddy worked in a mill" is getting almost as tiresome as Kerry's "service in Vietnam."
12 posted on
03/01/2004 2:07:56 AM PST by
onyx
(Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Jeffrey Dahmer, and Timothy McVeigh)
To: Fracas
Then the attack should be hypocracy, he condems corporations but has no qualm is using the same system as those he condemns. He is not as populist as he portrays is a valid point, the loophole argument is not a vailid point.
It is not a loophole, it is not illegal. The article needs to clarify that.
To: Fracas
Vice-President Cheney is not somebody I would want to debate. That guy knows his stuff, stays calm, and can rattle off hum-dingers when needed.
14 posted on
03/01/2004 2:09:10 AM PST by
GOPyouth
(De Oppresso Liber! The Tyrant is captured!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson