Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: churchillbuff
It's not in the subtitles I saw the other night, though it may still be in the Aramaic audio, in which case it will surely be translated in the versions overseas.

Why would Safire think that further subtitling would be out of Gibson's control?

That line was removed some time ago, why would he think it still remained in the audio? It's not like that part is set in stone either.

Anyway, if he's so concerned he can just go call James Cavaziel, who speaks Aramaic, and ask him if it's in the final print or not. Yeesh.

19 posted on 02/29/2004 9:38:44 PM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hellinahandcart
I want to know why he thinks the other countries will bother to translate ancient dialects of Aramaic, Greek and Latin into their own languages instead of simply translating the English subtitles.
67 posted on 03/01/2004 2:01:01 AM PST by stands2reason (Liberal lurkers: stick around, you may just grow a brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson