Skip to comments.
Scientists counter Bush view: Families varied, say anthropologists
SFGate ^
| Feb. 27, 2004
| Charles Burress
Posted on 02/29/2004 6:41:00 PM PST by DemWatch
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:45:57 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
The primary organization representing American anthropologists criticized President Bush's proposed constitutional ban on same-sex marriage Thursday and gave a failing grade to the president's understanding of human cultures.
"The results of more than a century of anthropological research on households, kinship relationships and families, across cultures and through time, provide no support whatsoever for the view that either civilization or viable social orders depend upon marriage as an exclusively heterosexual institution," said the executive board of the 11,000-member American Anthropological Association.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: academia; civilunion; delusional; homosexualagenda; marriage; subversives
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
1
posted on
02/29/2004 6:41:01 PM PST
by
DemWatch
To: DemWatch
Headline: "Liberal F-ggot snobs Bash Bush"
2
posted on
02/29/2004 6:44:18 PM PST
by
Betaille
(Seeing through moral relativism since 2002)
To: DemWatch
This is a bogus propaganda piece from the "Queer Mafia" (their term, not mine). It is a complete lie.
3
posted on
02/29/2004 6:44:35 PM PST
by
FormerACLUmember
(Man rises to greatness if greatness is expected of him)
To: DemWatch
Lots of these anthropologists come up with these stories to justify themselves to the young women they are hitting on every time they get out in the bush working on a grant!
Guess that makes them experts on what the President ought to say. Seems like we just got rid of a President who spent all his time thinkin like an anthropoligist on a field trip.
4
posted on
02/29/2004 6:45:05 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: FormerACLUmember
Exactly. They just make this stuff up. There has never been such a thing as recognized Christian same-sex marriages. This is complete garbage.
5
posted on
02/29/2004 6:47:35 PM PST
by
speedy
To: DemWatch
Segal pointed to "sanctified same-sex unions in the fourth century in Christianity" and to the Greeks and Romans applying the concept of marriage to same-sex couples, not to mention the Native American berdache tradition in which males married males. Christianity NEVER sanctified homosexual unions. To imply that "blood-brother" relationships were sexual in nature is dishonest. The Greeks and the Romans were accepting of homosexuality, but NEVER considered marriage as other than heterosexual. The Native Americans were not part of Western Civilization.
So much for these "scientists".
6
posted on
02/29/2004 6:47:48 PM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(Why the long face, John?)
To: DemWatch
Maybe one of these pink doctors should run for office.
7
posted on
02/29/2004 6:47:48 PM PST
by
reed_inthe_wind
(Vienna said the middlemen come from Ger, Nether,Belg, S Af, Jap,Dub, Mal,USA,Rus,Chin,and Pak.)
To: DemWatch
oh rats rear .............
8
posted on
02/29/2004 6:48:33 PM PST
by
HoustonCurmudgeon
(PEACE - Through Superior Firepower)
To: DemWatch
Nader, who is an association member, said Bush's proposal "serves the views of the religious right, and that has to do with getting votes." As opposed to appeasing members of the secular and immoral Left who won't vote for him regardless?
9
posted on
02/29/2004 6:49:00 PM PST
by
ServesURight
(FReecerely Yours,)
To: DemWatch
Oh yeah, If someone from Berkeley says it's so, then it must be true.
10
posted on
02/29/2004 6:49:12 PM PST
by
JoJo Gunn
(Intellectuals exist only if you believe they do. ©)
To: DemWatch
LOL! Tell the anthropologist that they wouldn't be anthropologist if the species couldn't procreate.
LOL.
5.56mm
11
posted on
02/29/2004 6:49:21 PM PST
by
M Kehoe
To: muawiyah
Anthropology is not a science, it is documented gossip! The most wonderful thing was learning that Margaret Meads' book "Coming of Age in Samoa (I think)" was based on tall tales the natives told her because they were embarrased by her questions!
To: DemWatch
"Fabrication" is just not laudry detergent cleansing process.
To: DemWatch
And as everyone knows, scientists are never wrong.
RIGHT!!(sarcasm)
14
posted on
02/29/2004 6:52:15 PM PST
by
airborne
(lead by example)
To: DemWatch
gal pointed to "sanctified same-sex unions in the fourth century in Christianity" and to the Greeks and Romans applying the concept of marriage to same-sex couples, not to mention the Native American berdache tradition in which males married males.
Neither the Greeks
nor the Romans applied the "concept of marriage to same-sex couples." And what heterodox proto-Christian, most likely grrr-nostic sect "sanctified same-sex unions?" And who ever heard of the Native American "berdache tradition?" Were these unions the norm? Or simply normal? Or what?
This academic rube is reaching, and his or her reach exceeds his or her grasp.
15
posted on
02/29/2004 6:53:10 PM PST
by
Asclepius
(karma vigilante)
To: speedy
Yes, homosexual marraige has been the bedrock of civilization throughout all of history. The Berkeley Queer Mafia has spoken the complete scientific truth. </bullfeces>
16
posted on
02/29/2004 6:53:29 PM PST
by
FormerACLUmember
(Man rises to greatness if greatness is expected of him)
To: DemWatch
If any of this daydream were true, it would have been blasted on headlines thirty years ago. Nice try, you fagging twits, but no sale here.
17
posted on
02/29/2004 6:55:08 PM PST
by
whereasandsoforth
(tagged for migratory purposes only)
To: DemWatch
Right! There's evidence in literature for marrying you mother and in history for marrying your sister, but it's still not a good idea to model your life after Oedipus or Caligula.
18
posted on
02/29/2004 6:56:06 PM PST
by
claudiustg
(Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
To: FormerACLUmember
Funny how he did not name any of these famous same-sex couples. As the old saying goes, "Behind every great man is -- uh, er -- another man."
19
posted on
02/29/2004 6:56:45 PM PST
by
speedy
To: DemWatch
What a bunch of goof-balls!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson