To: jedi
Just nuts.
Moore made and continues to make his point about the arbitrary and false Establisment rulings of the federal courts.
Pryor will, within his authority, make rulings truer to the Constitution.
We all win.
2 posted on
02/29/2004 12:25:40 PM PST by
mrsmith
("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
To: mrsmith
Pryor will, within his authority, make rulings truer to the Constitution. His future decisions will tell the tale; it'll be interesting to see how he deals with the Constitution.
3 posted on
02/29/2004 12:31:52 PM PST by
jedi
(Pre-digested opinions are so much simpler to assimilate)
To: mrsmith
William Pryor is a good man. He has had to defend himself from all sorts of untrue accusations from the left. The audacity of a practicing Catholic who is pro-life to be able to state that although he does not always support some of the cases he is obligated to prosecute, he has always sided with the laws in the books. This was in response from some so-called Catholic Lib senators (like Richard Durban) who were "disturbed" that Pryor was a practicing Catholic and actually believed the tenets of his church, and therefore per Durbins' bigoted little brain, it must be that Pryor was a danger to the leftist agnda.
I am surprised by this article. It seems to me Pryor was fulfilling his obligation regarding his position, not necessarily agreeing with the concept.
6 posted on
02/29/2004 1:06:29 PM PST by
Gumdrop
To: mrsmith
I don't know this Baldwin but sounds like Democrats trying to divide and conquer.
I think Pryor did what he thought was right and it pi$$ed me off. I think Judge Moore did the same. I would like to see the US Supreme Court take it up but it may be best to
wait until we have more stable Justices.
8 posted on
02/29/2004 1:11:00 PM PST by
gunnedah
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson