[Triple Word Score]

The article does not address the War on Terror or the Supreme Court.

Those are the most crucial two problems for all conservatives and moderates to consider when making a decision about voting in November 2004.

Without a liberal Supreme Court, America will not lose its sovereignty. With a liberal Supreme Court, America will lose everything in a very short time. There are crucial cases that will hit SCOTUS next year on many things near and dear to our hearts. One of them is whether or not American law can be subjugated to an international court. Do we want Bush appointees ruling on that, or Kerry's? It's that simple.

The connection between Kerry's positions and our sovereignty is not as direct as you think--until you consider the Supreme Court.

[buffyt]

"It is also likely Kerry would be inclined to support the International Criminal Court even though some of the world’s most tyrannical states are members. What these concerns add up to is a Democratic leader inclined to consider international before national interests."

'Nuff said!

[jpf]

I just know that I like Bush in the White House because in a moment of decision or crisis he'll be thinking about what's best for the United States. John Kerry,on the other hand, would be thinking to himself, "Gee what would Jacques Chirac do?"

[kcar]

At the risk of starting WWV, Kerry as inept blowhard POTUS with a Republican dominated House and Senate doesn't sound like the end of the world as we know it. Maybe it would re-ignite that time-tested friend of taxpayers known as "gridlock".

Republican-domination of all branches of government has not yet even threatened to yield lower taxes or government control. Fancy that: Lord Acton said something pertinent to say about that I think.

Why not make W sweat a bit and make him court us for a little while? Who want's whose vote? Work for it!

[My2Cents]

Had Kerry been President on 9/11/01, he would have turned investigation of the destruction and death of at the World Trade Center over to the NY District Attorney.

[My2Cents]

***Ping***

[I'm ALL Right!]

EARTH TO DIE-HARD LIBS:

Not all libs are in your camp! My eco-friendly, pro-choice, women's rights activist, democratic sister-in-law is in the BUSH camp! Says she cannot find anything GOOD about Mr. John Kerry. Says he's of the same ILK as Hillary! I think she wont be alone in her beliefs.

[Bud Krieger]

How many moderate/undecided voters are going to vote for John Kerry?

Lets be honest, it`s the moderates that will determine who the next President will be.

The moderate swing voters "are not" radical liberals. Pres. Bush "is not" a radical Conservative. John Kerry "is" a radical liberal.

It is not hard to see how this will eventually play out.

Pres. Bush gets re-elected by a comfortable margin.

[Tailback]

Kerry terrifies me also. The reason why is this old quote from the Clinton years.

"Stroke of the pen, law of the land. Cool huh?"

Kerry will simply outflank congress and give everything the trial lawyers, envirowhackos, homosexual lobbyists, and one-worlders want on a silver platter.

[concerned about politics]

If Kerry were to be elected, he'd turn our nation over to the UN anti-Christ in a heart beat. "They're all yours."

[Howlin]

While Kerry did vote for the war in Iraq

Although the press missed it this week, Kerry stated loud and clear that he voted FOR the war in Iraq only AFTER he looked at that vote with an eye toward running for president; "as a candidate" is exactly what he said.

[jpl]

It's almost a certainty that Kerry would all but abandon the War on Terror, and the U.S. would go back to its old policy of simply crossing our fingers and biding our time until the next attack. Problem is, the next attack might be 10,000 or 50,000, or 100,000 people instead of just 3,000.