Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: skip2myloo
Any attempt, especially by an NRA Director - and cosponsor of S. 1805 (Craig), to ameliorate it is a wrongheaded strategy in my viewpoint.

Agree wholeheartedly, but that's been the NRA's MO since at least 1934, when they managed to "compromise" on the National Firearms Act, which is as blatantly an infringement of the RKBA as virtually all other "gun control". They *supported* the near ban (at the time, inflation has made the $200 tax not so bad compared to the value of the guns) in exchange for removal of handguns from the same sort of restrictions that now cover machine guns, short barreled shotguns, etc. Then they didn't lift a finger to challenge it when the Supreme Court took up the is, not even a measly amicus brief, and thus only the government's side of the issue was ever addressed in the Court.

18 posted on 02/28/2004 12:02:07 PM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato
What did your grandparents or parents do to stop the National Firearms Act?
19 posted on 02/28/2004 12:18:12 PM PST by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: El Gato
Agree wholeheartedly, but that's been the NRA's MO since at least 1934, when they managed to "compromise" on the National Firearms Act,

Bud the NRA was not a Gun rights organization back then. It was centered around the shooting sports.

25 posted on 02/29/2004 8:17:51 PM PST by Nov3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson