Replies

This is the text of Senator Craig's testimony with Angel Shamaya's updated retraction. This should clear up many of the misconceptions of the amendment.

1 posted on 02/28/2004 6:54:43 AM PST by Shooter 2.5

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]

To: bang_list

The Gun Mfrs Liability Protection Act should pass as a clean Bill with the amendments removed. Please call your Senators with special attention to Majority Leader Frist.

http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

2 posted on 02/28/2004 7:00:15 AM PST by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shooter 2.5; Joe Brower

No sir, I don't like it at all. Substituting a "less restrictive" amendment for a more restrictive amendment is still a restriction.

4 posted on 02/28/2004 7:06:07 AM PST by wysiwyg (What parts of "right of the people" and "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shooter 2.5

Really! After reading all the comments, this bill should not be passed. More gun control by attached amendments, is not worth the cost. This bill has to be clean or no bill at all. This is unreal! Congress you all deserve to be voted out nor do you deserve gun owners trust.

31 posted on 03/01/2004 12:29:05 PM PST by kimber (Fight for the Right to Bear Arms!)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search

News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794