Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 1stFreedom
I liked the comanche. I thought it was great. But what we need instead are helicopters which are tougher than the Apaches. A few apaches have been taken down by medium and large caliber rounds.

I have news for you: ANY helicopter would be taken down by medium and large caliber rounds.

One guy complaining about the Comanche getting axed asked me, "What would've happened if we'd had a couple Comanches at Mogadishu?"

My answer: "We would've had 100 megabucks of burning wreckage on the ground."

8 posted on 02/27/2004 4:35:39 PM PST by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
I'm not sure I catch your point about the use of armed helicopters in smaller-scale conflicts like Somalia.

The book I read said Special Forces "little bird" helicopters were present all night, and they offered superb fire-support for the Delta and Ranger soldiers. I'm sure the Comanche could have done as well or better, but the cost in dollars would surely be high.
9 posted on 02/27/2004 4:48:17 PM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Poohbah
What we really need is an updated version of the A-10 and then give it to a service that'll appreciate it. The USAF is STOOPID to think the F-35 will replace the 'Hog.

Now a VTOL Hog would be something to see...
10 posted on 02/27/2004 4:48:45 PM PST by Ottofire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson