Skip to comments.
Bill requiring evolution disclaimer clears House
Claremore Progress ^
| 2/27/04
| Sean Murphy
Posted on 02/27/2004 12:04:20 PM PST by Michael_Michaelangelo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-310 next last
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
Another case of LWS (Legislating While Stupid)
41
posted on
02/27/2004 1:28:00 PM PST
by
Jeff Gordon
(LWS - Legislating While Stupid. Someone should make this illegal.)
To: Cinnamon Girl
nonsense some people made up who want to believe they're decended from monkeys. Though they're much to "sophisticated" to admit it.
42
posted on
02/27/2004 1:32:24 PM PST
by
Dataman
To: yellowdoghunter
Hey, that is what the evolutionists do. Get used to it.
Anybody who disagrees with them is just an idiot in the evolutionist mind, even those with doctorates.
43
posted on
02/27/2004 1:33:27 PM PST
by
rwfromkansas
("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
To: Right Wing Professor
Are you saying that evolution is not a theory?
44
posted on
02/27/2004 1:34:12 PM PST
by
cantfindagoodscreenname
(SAVE THE BLACK FLY (This tag line is getting old...any suggestions?))
To: Right Wing Professor
Are you saying that evolution is not a theory?
45
posted on
02/27/2004 1:34:18 PM PST
by
cantfindagoodscreenname
(SAVE THE BLACK FLY (This tag line is getting old...any suggestions?))
To: whattajoke
If they are biology majors, maybe.
But not if they are a different major.
46
posted on
02/27/2004 1:35:01 PM PST
by
rwfromkansas
("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
To: gawd
The evolutionist strawman; this is really a bunch of hooey but it is peddled out by liberal "Christian" scholars anyway.
The conservatives don't buy it.
I guess that makes you a liberal.
47
posted on
02/27/2004 1:37:38 PM PST
by
rwfromkansas
("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
To: JohnnyZ; Theo
Scientific theories should always be presented as theories rather than fact.
Well, gravity is just a theory. So is quantum mechanics. So most scientific ideas for that matter. Just because an idea is classified as a theory doesn't mean that the idea is completely speculative. Do you believe that gravity shouldn't be taught as a fact?
To: Blood of Tyrants
Every time this topic comes up, I can't help but remember seeing that fossil on TV of a crocodile which scientists claimed to be over 2 million years older than dinosaurs. The crocodile in the fossil looked EXACTLY like the ones today. "Jes how long does this evolution thingy take before sumpin changes?" LOL
49
posted on
02/27/2004 1:41:23 PM PST
by
moonman
To: gawd
If I may answer that, genesis actually contains two distinct and incompatible creation stories.
What are the two stories? Thanks...
To: moonman
Turn off the tv. Read. It's much more informative.
51
posted on
02/27/2004 1:45:59 PM PST
by
atlaw
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
"Warning: This theory could endanger your future salavation!!!"
How absurd.
Science teachers should always instruct students that all current knowledge indicates..... when referring to Evolution or similar theories. You could say the same thing about the expanding universe.
At one time physicists believed Newton explained it all. The Einstein and quantum theory came along.
Science is a long preocess of refinement of ideas, of experimenting, of postulating, of questioning.
Its not faith. Its science.
Faith is believing that Christ is the Son of God and He will come again to judge us all. That's what I BELIEVE.
I don't question it. I accept it on blind faith.
What I KNOW, is what scientific testing appears to indicate.
52
posted on
02/27/2004 1:48:12 PM PST
by
ZULU
(GOD BLESS SENATOR McCARTHY!!!!)
To: Stone Mountain
Well, gravity is just a theory. So is quantum mechanics. So most scientific ideas for that matter. Just because an idea is classified as a theory doesn't mean that the idea is completely speculative. Who said a theory is completely speculative?
Do you believe that gravity shouldn't be taught as a fact?
The theory of gravity, as I pointed out in an earlier post, is an excellent example of why theories should be taught as theories, considering that Newton's theory has given way to Eistein's theory. Sometimes -- quite often -- theories are wrong, at least in some respects.
53
posted on
02/27/2004 1:48:27 PM PST
by
JohnnyZ
(People don't just bump into each other and have sex. This isn't Cinemax! -- Jerry)
To: Hodar
Good post, critical thinking and scientific method can certainly help these students. Especially when they are told that the world's oceans will be ten feet higher in 30 years and it will be the United States' fault.
54
posted on
02/27/2004 1:48:55 PM PST
by
KC_for_Freedom
(Sailing the highways of America, and loving it.)
To: moonman
The crocodile in the fossil looked EXACTLY like the ones today. "Jes how long does this evolution thingy take before sumpin changes?" LOL
Wow. Biology 101 (moonman vernacular): If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Crocs have been relatively unchanged because they've never needed to as a top predator in their stable niche. They've had no selective pressures on them to cause any change in their allele frequencies for quite some time, though they have gotten smaller over the Ages.
What dope would not explain this on TV?
To: moonman
Every time this topic comes up, I can't help but remember seeing that fossil on TV of a crocodile which scientists claimed to be over 2 million years older than dinosaurs. The crocodile in the fossil looked EXACTLY like the ones today. "Jes how long does this evolution thingy take before sumpin changes?" LOL
What is your specific problem with this? Is it that you don't believe that the fossil was that old? Or is it that you don't believe that natural selection could possibly keep a life form static for that long if other animals were evolving? Or is it something else?
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
" ... controversial theory and not fact."
They forgot this theory lacks objective evidence. To suggest it is a theory is pushing the envelope. It's really an agenda laden hypothesis.
57
posted on
02/27/2004 1:51:48 PM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: Blood of Tyrants
The evolution supporters will soon be here to tell everyone how stupid they are for not believing in evolution even though there are HUGE gaps in evolution theory that they simply make up
Actually, it's typically creationists (though not all creationists) who just "make up" these alleged gamps in the theory.
58
posted on
02/27/2004 1:51:57 PM PST
by
Dimensio
(I gave you LIFE! I -- AAAAAAAAH!)
To: Physicist
LOL!
Will "natrual selection" ever kick in? If it has, then why are you here? Surely YOU would have been weeded out.
59
posted on
02/27/2004 1:53:11 PM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: Cinnamon Girl
I told her it was some nonsense some people made up who want to believe they're decended from monkeys.
Why do you think some people WANT to believe that they're descended from monkeys?
Incidentally, if you care, the theory is not that we are descended from monkeys - it's that monkeys and people had ancestors in common.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-310 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson