Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shooter 2.5
All of their comments concerning Craig.

Their 'comments' concerning Craig were in the form of directly quoting him. Seems fair to me. The NRA released this concerning Craig:

The debate continued late into the evening with no substantive movement on the bill and no additional votes were taken. Senators did, however, reach a "Unanimous Consent Agreement" spelling out specific amendments that would be permitted to be offered during the debate in anticipation of a final vote on the underlying measure next Tuesday.

They just failed to say that it was Craig who agreed to the "Unanimous Consent Agreement" and that the UCA opened this bill up for all these gun-control amendments as the GOA article above does.

If your idea of saner is keeping people in the dark about who's doing what then I'll go with the crazy websites. Intentional lack of information has never won any kind of battle.

17 posted on 02/27/2004 8:58:09 AM PST by TigersEye (Carrying a gun is a social obligation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye
"Let's send a message that armor piercing ammunition is flat off limits," said Sen. Craig.

So how many times does he have to say this before it sinks in?
22 posted on 02/27/2004 9:07:40 AM PST by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson