Skip to comments.
Rocky Mountain Gun Owners Alert: Kill 1805 Immediately
Rocky Mountain Gun Owners ^
| 02/26/04
| Rocky Mountain Gun Owners
Posted on 02/27/2004 7:54:46 AM PST by Copernicus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
To: RockChucker; Blood of Tyrants; Cboldt
ping
21
posted on
02/27/2004 9:05:55 AM PST
by
FBD
(...Please press 2 for English...for Espanol, please stay on the line...)
To: TigersEye
"Let's send a message that armor piercing ammunition is flat off limits," said Sen. Craig.
So how many times does he have to say this before it sinks in?
22
posted on
02/27/2004 9:07:40 AM PST
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: Shooter 2.5
"Let's send a message that armor piercing ammunition is flat off limits," said Sen. Craig. So how many times does he have to say this before it sinks in? Before what 'sinks in'. Do you support banning armour piercing ammunition? Sen. Craig appears to support banning it.
23
posted on
02/27/2004 9:09:34 AM PST
by
ArrogantBustard
(Chief Engineer, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemens' Club)
To: Shooter 2.5
Wow.
A web site that makes keepandbeararms look almost sane. Remarkable. I'm still waiting for them to post the photos of NRA Director Larry Craig keeping a smile on his friends' faces:
Fri Feb 27, 8:41 AM ET Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y. laughs after being introduced as being from Texas by Sen. Larry Craig , R-Idaho, during a press conference on foster care with actor Bruce Willis at the U.S. Capitol in Washington Wednesday, June 11, 2003. Behind her are Sen. Mary Landrieu), D-La., and Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, right.
(AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)
24
posted on
02/27/2004 9:09:42 AM PST
by
archy
(Concrete shoes, cyanide, TNT! Done dirt cheap! Neckties, contracts, high voltage...Done dirt cheap!)
To: Shooter 2.5
Frist/Craig - Cop Killer bullets (a toned down, yet still anti-gun rights version of Kennedy's amendment)One more time for the sheep in the back.
25
posted on
02/27/2004 9:11:26 AM PST
by
TigersEye
(Carrying a gun is a social obligation.)
To: ArrogantBustard
Beofre this sinks in:
"Let's send a message that armor piercing ammunition is flat off limits," said Sen. Craig.
Should I repeat it a couple more times?
26
posted on
02/27/2004 9:15:07 AM PST
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: TigersEye
Is that a ban or a study? Do you know the difference?
27
posted on
02/27/2004 9:16:24 AM PST
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: Shooter 2.5
Should I repeat it a couple more times?A little louder, there's so much bleating it almost sounds like it's coming from the bandstand.
28
posted on
02/27/2004 9:19:09 AM PST
by
TigersEye
(Carrying a gun is a social obligation.)
To: Monty22; CheezyD
I agree with CheezyD, there is waaayyy too much rhetoric flying around. I have read all the amendments passed so far and there isn't a deal killer in there yet. Feinswines AW amendment hasn't even been added yet, so the accuracy of this article is suspect.
29
posted on
02/27/2004 9:21:20 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: Shooter 2.5
On the Senate floor today, he introduced, discussed, defended and tried to justify the "Craig/Frist" amendment. This amendment, said Craig, is needed "to strengthen current armor piercing ammunition law." NRA's point-man in the U.S. Senate says that this is "what the law enforcement community needs." "We don't want to wipe out the hunting and sporting ammunition," said Craig. The "sporting purpose" test was used before -- as justification for firearm rights infringements via the 1938 Nazi Weapons Law and later copied nearly verbatim in the U.S. Gun Control Act of 1968.
"Let's send a message that armor piercing ammunition is flat off limits," said Sen. Craig.
Thank you, Shooter 2.5, for motivating me to reread this. Now that I read it all in context again I see that Sen. Craig means that AP ammo should be off limits to the public not to legislation. The study is for just what I've been saying it's for; coming up with new ways to define "armor piercing" ammunition.
30
posted on
02/27/2004 9:27:57 AM PST
by
TigersEye
(Carrying a gun is a social obligation.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Feinswines AW amendment hasn't even been added yet, so the accuracy of this article is suspect.The article didn't say that it had been added already so how can you use that to show inaccuracy? You're creating disinformation.
31
posted on
02/27/2004 9:31:04 AM PST
by
TigersEye
(Carrying a gun is a social obligation.)
To: Shooter 2.5
Repeat it?
No. You should explain it.
Try answering my question. The answer is either "yes" or "no". I realise that politicians have trouble with such simple honesty, but you shouldn't.
32
posted on
02/27/2004 9:32:23 AM PST
by
ArrogantBustard
(Chief Engineer, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemens' Club)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Levin is saying now that, basically, gun manufacturers and gun dealers should be guilty until proven innocent.
33
posted on
02/27/2004 9:39:59 AM PST
by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
To: Shooter 2.5
So how many times does he have to say this before it sinks in?
Since you appear to have access to a complete,full and accurate copy of the text of the Craig/Frist Amendment, I would be very grateful if you would post a link to or printout of the language.
In the public arena of political debate what someone SAYS or DOES or MEANS can be and frequently are completely separate activities.
I appreciate any input that does not involve hearsay or ad homeniem argument.
Best regards,
34
posted on
02/27/2004 9:44:34 AM PST
by
Copernicus
(A Constitutional Republic revolves around Sovereign Citizens, not citizens around government.)
To: philetus
Levin is saying, someone who is injured (shot), should be able to get money from gun dealers and makers ,EVEN if the dealer or maker can NOT be shown to be at fault.
35
posted on
02/27/2004 9:45:16 AM PST
by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
To: ArrogantBustard; TigersEye
It's pretty obvious there is a faction here at FR that is willing to accept 'bullet bans' [and possibly AWB's] in order to prevent spurious lawsuits against gun manufacturer's..
Bizarre/diversionary reasoning once again. The fox is in the henhouse, and they say we must pass more laws on arcane legalities regarding lawsuits.
36
posted on
02/27/2004 9:46:21 AM PST
by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines conservatism; - not the GOP. .)
To: TigersEye
Now that I read it all in context again I see that Sen. Craig means that AP ammo should be off limits to the public not to legislation.
The study is for just what I've been saying it's for; coming up with new ways to define "armor piercing" ammunition.
30 -TE-
______________________________________
Incredible that the agit-prop line-makers would have that obvious position reversed, isn't it?
Almost duplicitous, I would say..
37
posted on
02/27/2004 9:56:06 AM PST
by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines conservatism; - not the GOP. .)
To: Copernicus
Very misleading. For example:
"NRA Board Member Sen. Larry Craig has agreed to allow a slated list of gun control amendments to S.1805. These include, but are not limited to, the following unspecified gun controls:"
This implies Craig (and the NRA) have agreed to these ammendments being included in the bill. But, later on, we learn:
" allow a huge number of amendments to be debated"
Craig hasn't "agreed" to these ammendments, he only agreed to allowing debate. This is the Senate, "the worlds greatest debating society".
But, the author goes further claiming:
" many of which that board member (and US Senator) knows will pass?"
Why should we trust his judgement in predicting passage when he's already been shown distort the facts?
As others have said, "don't get your panties in a wad", yet.
To: Copernicus
I can't get through to any of the primary parties involved. I think there's too much smoke to pass anything.
The NRA should call it off if it can't even hold up its own phone line, and (sheesh) can't even control its own officers.
39
posted on
02/27/2004 10:00:40 AM PST
by
SteveH
To: SteveH
Pobert Byrd is on now. Is he drunk or just retarded?
40
posted on
02/27/2004 10:10:14 AM PST
by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson